131 Kentucky car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

A 13-year-old passenger was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended on the highway. The collision caused minor damage. The passenger sought damages for neck and back pain, headaches, dizziness, jaw pain, and hand weakness. The defense argued the wreck was too minor to cause injury. After a first trial resulted in a defense judgment, a new trial was granted. The second trial awarded the passenger medical bills and some future care, totaling $56,087.

One driver stopped at a red light was struck head-on by another vehicle that swerved to avoid a third vehicle. The impact caused the stopped driver to suffer a fractured collarbone, requiring surgery. The case involved claims for medical expenses and pain and suffering.

One driver rear-ended another on a highway. The injured driver, who was pregnant at the time, hit the steering wheel. She was concerned about her baby's health but the baby was fine. She treated for back pain and was unable to take pain medication due to her pregnancy. The case focused on the extent of her injuries and pain.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped in traffic. The injured driver sought treatment for neck pain and a disc protrusion. The defense argued the injury was a transient soft-tissue issue. The jury awarded damages for pain and suffering.

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident that resulted in bodily injuries. The case was heard in the Kentucky Circuit Court.

One driver was traveling home from work when the oncoming driver turned left in front of her, causing a collision. The injured driver treated for a mild traumatic brain injury that worsened her pre-existing migraines and anxiety. Her injuries affected her cognitive function, memory, and speech. After the oncoming driver settled, the injured driver sought underinsured motorist coverage from her own insurance company. The jury determined the amount of pain and suffering damages.

A rear-end collision occurred. The injured person sustained a Lis Franc fracture. A jury awarded damages for pain and suffering, with a reduction for comparative fault.

A driver was stopped in traffic during heavy rain when another driver rear-ended her vehicle. The initial crash was minor with no injuries reported at the scene. The injured driver later sought treatment for neck pain, which a doctor identified as a permanent injury. The defense argued the ongoing care was unrelated to the crash and questioned the delay in treatment. The jury found the officer at fault but also assigned some fault to the injured driver.

One driver alleged the other driver ran a red light, causing a t-bone collision. The injured driver sought medical treatment for shoulder pain, which included surgery. The defense argued the injury was not directly related to the crash and was more likely due to the injured driver's active lifestyle. The jury found the defendant at fault and awarded the injured driver a portion of their medical bills.

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The case resulted in a traumatic brain injury for one party. The jury awarded damages.

A drunk driver rear-ended a vehicle carrying two passengers in Mayfield. The collision caused moderate damage, and both passengers claimed to have lost consciousness. They subsequently treated for traumatic brain injuries, with medical evidence including MRIs and EEGs supporting their claims. Witnesses also reported significant changes in their behavior and cognitive abilities after the crash, leading them to move in with relatives. The defense contested the brain injury diagnosis, suggesting alternative explanations for the medical findings and questioning the severity of the reported symptoms.

One driver stopped at a red light was rear-ended by another vehicle. The collision caused minor damage to the first vehicle. The driver sought treatment for soft-tissue symptoms and complained of ongoing issues, including aggravation of a pre-existing condition. Medical experts disagreed on the extent of the injury and the need for future surgery. The jury awarded the injured driver her medical bills and a smaller amount for pain and suffering, but the total award was below the underinsured motorist coverage limit.