Franklin County Jury Awards $56,087 in Rear-End Collision
A 13-year-old passenger was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended on the highway. The collision caused minor damage. The passenger sought damages for neck and back pain, headaches, dizziness, jaw pain, and hand weakness. The defense argued the wreck was too minor to cause injury. After a first trial resulted in a defense judgment, a new trial was granted. The second trial awarded the passenger medical bills and some future care, totaling $56,087.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $56,087
- County
- Franklin County, KY
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $56,087 is above the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In late 2006, a 13-year-old passenger was traveling on I-64 in Franklin County when the vehicle she occupied was rear-ended in a chain-reaction collision. The incident resulted in minor vehicle damage but the passenger later sought treatment for neck and back pain, headaches, dizziness, jaw pain, and hand weakness. After exhausting the at-fault driver's insurance policy limits, the passenger, now the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against her own underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier, Shelter Mutual, seeking additional damages.
The plaintiff's orthopedic expert confirmed a strain injury with objective muscle spasms. The defendant, Shelter Mutual, argued the collision was too minor to cause compensable injuries and presented expert testimony to diminish the claimed damages. The case proceeded to a damages-only trial in August 2014, where the jury awarded the plaintiff $15,000 for medical expenses but rejected claims for future care and pain and suffering. A defense judgment was subsequently entered, as the award did not exceed the presumed UIM coverage threshold.
The plaintiff moved for a new trial, arguing the verdict was inadequate. The court granted the motion in November 2014, finding that even the defense expert acknowledged some injury and that the jury's skepticism had obscured its view of the evidence. A second trial occurred in May, where the jury was permitted to view the UIM contract, with a judicial instruction not to draw conclusions from it. The jury ultimately awarded the plaintiff $19,037 for medical expenses, $3,600 for future care, and $33,450 for past pain and suffering, totaling $56,087. The jury did not award damages for future pain and suffering. At the time of the record's review, no final judgment had been entered, but it was anticipated to be $21,087 after accounting for the tortfeasor's policy limits and personal injury protection (PIP) coverage.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Franklin County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Franklin County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.