One driver rear-ended another vehicle on Interstate 25. The occupants of the rear-ended vehicle sued the other driver for negligence. They sought damages for pain and suffering, bodily injury, and medical expenses. A jury found in favor of the plaintiffs and awarded them damages.
One driver turned left and collided with another vehicle, causing damage and injuries. The injured driver sued, alleging the other driver failed to yield the right-of-way. A jury found both drivers partially at fault but awarded damages to the injured driver.
One driver failed to stop at a stop sign and collided with another car. The driver of the second car claimed personal injuries from the accident. A jury found in favor of the injured driver and awarded damages for noneconomic losses, economic losses, and physical impairment.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle while turning into a parking lot. The driver of the struck vehicle sustained physical injuries, pain, suffering, and economic loss. The spouse of the injured driver claimed loss of consortium. The case was brought to court for negligence, and a jury awarded damages to the plaintiffs.
One driver collided with another driver, causing physical injuries. The injured driver filed an uninsured motorist claim with her insurance company. The insurance company failed to make payments for the injuries. The injured driver sued the insurance company for breach of contract. The case was settled for $15,000.
A shuttle service company allegedly refused to hire an applicant for a driver position because of his age. The applicant was 79 years old and met all the job qualifications. The company's insurance policy reportedly would not cover him due to his age. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a complaint on behalf of the applicant, alleging age discrimination.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, causing a chain reaction collision. The driver of the middle vehicle allegedly sustained injuries, including pain and suffering, medical expenses, and economic loss. The case proceeded to a jury trial where a verdict was rendered in favor of the injured driver.
One driver claimed the other driver negligently operated a vehicle, causing a collision. The driver alleged the other party was reckless, failed to yield, and made an unsafe turn. As a result, the injured driver sustained bodily injuries and incurred expenses.
One driver's vehicle collided with the rear end of another vehicle carrying a passenger. The occupants of the struck vehicle allegedly sustained serious injuries and incurred economic losses. The case involved claims of negligence, with the defendant asserting defenses such as comparative negligence and failure to mitigate damages. The parties reached a settlement for one of the passengers, and a jury later rendered a verdict in favor of the other passenger.
One driver collided with another driver's pickup truck. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to her back, spine, and neck. The case involved allegations of negligence and comparative negligence. A jury found the defendant driver to be 65 percent negligent and the plaintiff driver to be 35 percent negligent.
One driver's vehicle collided with a glass storefront, causing it to shatter near a person standing by the impact point. The person sustained physical injuries, economic losses, and emotional distress. The case involved claims of negligence and breach of an insurance contract. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
Denver County • 2015
Geography
Where Colorado Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Colorado.
Key legal rules that affect how Colorado car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (50% bar)
Statute of Limitations
3 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage
Colorado follows a 50% bar rule—if you are 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover damages.
Non-economic damages are capped and adjusted annually for inflation. The cap is approximately $642,180 unless the court finds clear and convincing evidence justifying a higher amount.
Colorado requires PIP coverage with minimum $5,000 in medical payments, which applies regardless of fault.
FAQ
Colorado Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Colorado case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Colorado attorney for guidance specific to your situation.