One driver's vehicle was struck by an unsecured load that fell from a truck. The injured person sued both drivers, alleging negligence. The jury found one driver not negligent but the other driver partially at fault. The injured person was also found partially at fault.
One driver was stopped at the request of a pilot truck when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. The collision also caused the second vehicle to hit the pilot truck. The injured driver claimed injuries to their neck, back, leg, and foot.
One driver was stopped at a traffic light when a vehicle hauling a boat struck the boat, causing it to hit the driver's SUV. The driver sustained a brain injury and required therapy. The driver sued the other driver for negligence.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 70 when the driver behind them failed to stop and collided with the rear of their vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended made a demand to their insurance company for underinsured motorist coverage, which was refused. A lawsuit was filed for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. A jury awarded damages for economic and non-economic losses.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The person in the struck vehicle reported neck and back pain, stiffness, and difficulty with daily activities. They also experienced loss of enjoyment, mental anguish, and incurred medical expenses and economic losses. The case involved claims of negligence, with the defendant denying allegations and raising affirmative defenses. A jury awarded damages to the injured person.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle. This impact pushed the first vehicle into the vehicle in front of it. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed they suffered injuries from the collision. The driver who caused the initial impact received a traffic citation.
A King Soopers van driven by an employee collided with a car. The driver of the car alleged soft tissue injuries to her back and neck. The case went to court, and a jury awarded damages. The parties later settled the case.
One vehicle stopped at an intersection was struck from behind by another vehicle. The passenger in the stopped vehicle claimed serious and permanent injuries. The driver of the striking vehicle argued the injured person was comparatively negligent. A jury found the striking driver negligent and awarded damages for economic losses, non-economic losses, and physical impairment.
One driver's vehicle collided with another driver's vehicle. The second driver allegedly sustained serious and permanent personal injuries and incurred economic loss. The case went to a jury trial, which resulted in a verdict in favor of the injured driver.
One driver slowed for a red light and was rear-ended by the vehicle behind them. The impact pushed the first vehicle into the car in front of it, injuring both occupants. The injured parties sued the driver who caused the collision, alleging negligence. The defense argued various factors, including comparative negligence and pre-existing conditions. A jury awarded damages for economic and non-economic losses.
Key legal rules that affect how Colorado car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (50% bar)
Statute of Limitations
3 years from the date of the accident
Minimum Liability
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident / $15,000 property damage
Colorado follows a 50% bar rule—if you are 50% or more at fault, you cannot recover damages.
Non-economic damages are capped and adjusted annually for inflation. The cap is approximately $642,180 unless the court finds clear and convincing evidence justifying a higher amount.
Colorado requires PIP coverage with minimum $5,000 in medical payments, which applies regardless of fault.
FAQ
Colorado Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Colorado case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Colorado attorney for guidance specific to your situation.