68 Arizona car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One person loaned another person money to build an aircraft hangar. The hangar later caught fire and destroyed the aircraft. The lender sued the borrower for the loan money and the value of the aircraft. The parties settled the contract dispute, with the borrower agreeing to pay a portion of the loan. The court later ruled on other claims, finding no bailment or negligence on the borrower's part. The borrower was awarded costs and expert witness fees.

One driver's car top carrier was installed negligently, leading to an accident. The incident aggravated a pre-existing medical condition.

One driver and another driver were involved in a car crash. The first driver claimed the second driver's actions caused injuries to a previous back surgery, carpal tunnel syndrome, and soft tissue damage. The second driver admitted fault but argued the injuries were pre-existing and only minor. The first driver sought $88,000 in damages.

One driver was involved in a work-related car accident. The other driver's insurance paid their policy limit. The injured driver then sought underinsured motorist benefits from their own insurance company. After a dispute over the amount owed, the case went to arbitration, which determined the injured driver's damages were higher than the policy limit. The insurance company paid the policy limit, but a subsequent bad faith claim was denied.

One driver and two passengers were involved in a motor vehicle collision. The driver sustained injuries resulting in medical expenses. The driver sought compensation from the at-fault motorist and later filed a claim with their own insurance company for underinsured motorist benefits. The insurance company denied the claim, stating the driver had rejected this coverage. The case went to court, and after an appeal, the parties settled.

One driver brought an action against another motorist after a collision. The driver then filed a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the collision caused depression and that their damages exceeded the other driver's limits. The insurance company refused to pay, and the driver alleged breach of contract and bad faith for failure to conduct an adequate investigation. The defense argued that the depression was not related to the accident or was exaggerated.

A parking lot accident occurred. The injured person experienced thoracic and lumbar strain and sprain. The plaintiff was found to be 20% at fault.

A collision occurred in Chandler, Arizona, between an installation truck and a van. The owner of the truck claimed the other driver caused $15,000 in property damage to their vehicle. The owner sued to recover the costs after the other party refused to pay.

One driver was injured in an auto accident and later received medical treatment. The driver believed their health insurance would cover the costs. However, a company that purchased the medical provider's receivables sought payment from the driver. The driver filed a complaint to clarify who should pay for the medical services. The court ruled in favor of the driver, stating the company could not bill them directly.

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The injured person sustained ulnar nerve injuries and a concussion. The case resulted in a jury verdict for the plaintiff.

One driver made a negligent left turn into the path of another vehicle, causing a collision. The injured driver sustained soft tissue injuries to their neck, back, and chest, along with cuts and bruises. Medical expenses were claimed.

One driver admitted fault for a collision that damaged another person's vehicle. The damaged vehicle was repaired, but the owner believed it lost value. An expert estimated this diminished value. The owner filed a complaint seeking compensation for this loss. The court denied a motion for summary judgment, and the case proceeded to arbitration.