Texas Jury Awards $99.6M in Rear-End Collision & Product Defect
A driver stopped for a school bus and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The impact caused the front seat of the struck vehicle to collapse, leading to severe injuries for a child in the back seat. The child sustained a skull fracture and permanent brain damage. The lawsuit alleged negligence by the driver who caused the collision and product liability claims against the vehicle manufacturers for a defective seat design.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Spinal Cord Injury Injuries
Spinal cord injuries are among the most catastrophic outcomes of car accidents, potentially resulting in partial or complete paralysis. These injuries require extensive medical care and significantly impact quality of life.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $124,496,994
- County
- Bexar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $124,496,994 is above the median of $25,955,498 for spinal cord injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,000,000 to $67,470,000, based on 23 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On December 18, 2012, a plaintiff driver was transporting his two sons, including a 7-year-old plaintiff, in a 2005 Audi A4 on Highway 16 near San Antonio, Texas. The driver stopped for a school bus when a 2009 Chevrolet HHR, driven by a defendant driver, rear-ended their vehicle. The 7-year-old plaintiff, seated behind the driver, sustained a skull fracture.
A lawsuit was filed on the injured child's behalf, naming the striking driver for negligence and Audi AG and Volkswagen Group of America Inc., the vehicle's manufacturers and distributors, for products liability. The claims against the manufacturers included design defect, manufacturing defect, negligent failure to warn or instruct, and gross negligence. Plaintiffs contended the Audi's driver seat was defectively designed to collapse backward beyond 60 degrees in a rear-end collision, creating a known risk of the front-seat occupant colliding with a back-seat occupant. They argued the driver was thrown backward, and his head struck the child's head, causing the injuries. The manufacturers denied defects or negligence, asserted the seats met federal standards, and claimed neither the driver nor the child was wearing a seatbelt. The striking driver admitted causing the accident but contended the injuries were due to the vehicle's defects.
The 7-year-old plaintiff suffered a depressed skull fracture, leading to permanent severe brain damage, right-side paralysis, blindness, severe learning disabilities, bowel and bladder incontinence, and uncontrollable seizures. He underwent multiple operations and extensive medical treatment, with stipulated past and future medical costs exceeding $19 million.
After a four-week trial, the jury found design defect, manufacturing defect, and negligence in warning or instructing by Audi and Volkswagen. The jury also found negligence by the striking driver and the plaintiff driver. Comparative responsibility was assigned as 55 percent to Audi and Volkswagen, 25 percent to the striking driver, and 20 percent to the plaintiff driver. The jury additionally found Audi grossly negligent and awarded the injured plaintiff over $124 million. After reduction for comparative responsibility, the final recovery totaled approximately $99.6 million.
Understanding This Case
- Spinal cord injuries are typically permanent, though some incomplete injuries may see partial recovery. Life expectancy may be reduced, and quality of life is significantly impacted.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Bexar County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bexar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.