Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Bexar County • 2019

San Antonio Jury Awards $50,000 in Rear-End UIM Case

A driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while waiting to enter a freeway access road. The injured driver claimed back injuries and sought underinsured motorist benefits. The trial focused on causation and damages, with the jury awarding compensation for past and future medical costs, pain, and impairment.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$229,900
County
Bexar County, TX
Resolved
2019

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $229,900 is above the median of $60,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $229,900, based on 396 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In April 2012, a plaintiff was involved in a rear-end collision at a yield sign in San Antonio, Texas, while driving a compact car. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained back injuries from the incident. After settling with the at-fault driver for the policy limit of $30,000, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Allstate Insurance Co., seeking underinsured motorist benefits. Allstate stipulated to the negligence of the at-fault driver, making causation and damages the primary issues at trial.

The plaintiff underwent extensive medical treatment for claimed back, neck, and shoulder pain, including urgent care, chiropractic sessions, physical therapy, pain medication, trigger-point injections, and lumbar epidural steroid injections. An MRI revealed a disc bulge with spinal canal narrowing and spondylosis. An orthopedic surgeon recommended future lumbar surgery, estimated to cost $162,000. While acknowledging a 2014 accident aggravated the disc bulge into a herniation, the plaintiff contended some ongoing pain and impairment remained attributable to the 2012 collision. Plaintiff's counsel highlighted that despite pre-existing scoliosis, no MRI or surgery had been recommended before the 2012 accident.

The defense argued that the plaintiff's complaints were related to pre-existing conditions, including scoliosis and prior chiropractic care, and introduced records from 2007 mentioning another motor vehicle accident. The defense further contended that ongoing issues stemmed from the 2014 accident, not the 2012 event, and emphasized that the surgical recommendation and last treatment occurred several years before the trial.

After a one-day trial and two hours of deliberation, a six-person jury awarded the plaintiff $229,900 for past and future medical costs, pain, anguish, and impairment. This amount was reduced by the $30,000 received from the at-fault driver, resulting in a net award of $199,900. However, the plaintiff's recovery was ultimately limited to the $50,000 underinsured motorist policy limit.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Bexar County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

50
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bexar County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case