San Antonio Jury Awards $229,900 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when another driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed back, neck, and shoulder pain. She received treatment including chiropractic care, physical therapy, and injections. A later MRI showed a disc bulge. She later had another accident which aggravated her condition. The defense argued her issues were pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $229,900
- County
- Bexar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $229,900 is above the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On April 12, 2012, a sales clerk was rear-ended in San Antonio while driving a compact car, claiming back injuries. The incident occurred at a yield sign as she waited to enter a freeway access road. The plaintiff settled with the at-fault driver for their $30,000 policy limit and then sued her underinsured motorist insurer, the defendant, for additional benefits. The defendant stipulated to the at-fault driver's negligence, so the trial focused on causation and damages.
The plaintiff underwent extensive medical treatment for her back injuries, including chiropractic care, physical therapy, pain medication, injections, and a lumbar MRI which showed a disc bulge and spondylosis. An orthopedic surgeon later recommended a laminectomy and discectomy, estimated to cost $162,000. While the plaintiff had pre-existing scoliosis and prior chiropractic care, her counsel emphasized she had no prior MRI or surgery recommendation before the 2012 accident. She experienced another motor vehicle accident in April 2014, which she acknowledged aggravated her disc bulge, but maintained that some ongoing pain stemmed from the 2012 collision.
The defense argued the plaintiff's complaints were linked to pre-existing conditions, citing her scoliosis and prior chiropractic records, which included a reference to another 2007 motor vehicle accident. They also contended that her ongoing pain was primarily due to the 2014 accident and highlighted the time gap since her surgical recommendation and last treatment. After a one-day trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $229,900. This amount was offset by the $30,000 received from the at-fault driver, resulting in a net award of $199,900. However, the plaintiff's recovery was ultimately limited to her $50,000 underinsured motorist policy limit.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Bexar County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bexar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.