Plano, Texas Jury Awards $6,100 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a traffic light when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed back and neck injuries, including disc bulges and headaches. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the credibility of the injured driver and their medical experts. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages for past medical bills.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,100
- County
- Collin County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $6,100 is below the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On November 20, 2012, a process server was driving a Toyota Camry northbound on Preston Road in Plano, Texas, when their vehicle was rear-ended by a Nissan Altima at a traffic light at Park Boulevard. The plaintiff, who claimed neck and back injuries, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver of the Nissan, alleging negligence.
The plaintiff reported experiencing cervical disc bulges, lumbar sprains, headaches, and blurry vision following the collision. Treatment included an emergency room visit, chiropractic care, consultations with a neurologist, and epidural steroid injections administered by an orthopedic surgeon. The plaintiff sought approximately $61,000 for medical expenses, along with damages for past pain and suffering and physical impairment. An orthopedic surgeon testified that the plaintiff's treatment was reasonable, necessary, and caused by the accident.
The defendant admitted to rear-ending the plaintiff but argued it was an accident. The defendant stated the traffic light had turned green, and while turning to assist a sick child, they did not realize the plaintiff's vehicle had not moved forward. Defense counsel challenged the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and the necessity of treatment, highlighting a 105-day gap in care and suggesting a financial interest by the treating orthopedic surgeon. The defense also presented evidence of minor vehicle damage and noted the plaintiff had a history of lumbar pain.
After a one-day trial, a jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $6,100, specifically for past medical bills. No damages were awarded for pain and suffering or physical impairment. The limited award suggested the jury accepted some, but not all, of the plaintiff's claimed medical expenses, possibly influenced by the defense's arguments regarding the treatment gap, physician's credibility, and the nature of the impact.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Collin County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to understand your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Collin County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.