Pharr Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $40,000
One driver was traveling south on a highway when another driver rear-ended their pickup truck. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their head, neck, and lower back. The case involved a claim for underinsured motorist benefits against the pickup truck driver's own insurance company.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $40,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This settlement of $40,000 is near the median of $151,500 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $32,080 to $729,994, based on 46 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In November 2013, a 57-year-old construction worker was rear-ended by a sedan while driving south on Highway 281 in Pharr, Texas. The plaintiff reported head, neck, and lower back injuries and later settled with the sedan driver for her $30,000 auto insurance policy limit. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against his underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., seeking additional benefits.
The plaintiff alleged the sedan driver was negligent, having failed to control her speed as cited in the police report. He claimed the collision caused various injuries, including multiple disc herniations in his cervical and lumbar spine, cervical radiculopathy, and, later, degenerative osteoarthritis and suprapatellar bursitis in both knees. A radiologist testified for the plaintiff about MRI findings and nerve conduction study results, with damages sought for past and future medical expenses, pain, anguish, loss of earning capacity, and physical impairment.
State Farm disputed the plaintiff's claims, arguing there was insufficient proof of liability because the investigating officer did not determine negligence. The defense contended that the plaintiff's knee conditions were related to age and occupation rather than the accident, and questioned the severity of his injuries, noting he did not miss work. Defense counsel also challenged the plaintiff's medical billing and highlighted that the plaintiff's expert acknowledged osteoarthritis and bursitis were not typically caused by accidents.
After a two-day trial, a jury in Pharr deliberated for one hour. The jury found the sedan driver negligent and awarded the plaintiff $40,000 in damages. However, after accounting for State Farm's $30,000 credit from the initial liability settlement and an additional $5,000 credit for personal injury protection benefits, State Farm's net liability for the awarded damages was reduced to $5,000.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.