McAllen Jury Awards $32,709 in Rear-End Collision
A police employee was stopped at a traffic light in McAllen when his pickup truck was rear-ended. The impact pushed his vehicle into the car in front of it. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the third vehicle rear-ended her and pushed her into the plaintiff's truck. The plaintiffs, including the driver and his two daughters, claimed back and knee injuries. The jury found only the driver of the second vehicle negligent.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $32,710
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $32,710 is near the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In McAllen, a driver and two minor passengers filed a lawsuit after a three-car rear-end collision on February 10, 2015. The plaintiffs were stopped at a light when their vehicle was struck from behind by the first defendant's SUV, which was then struck by the second defendant's compact car. The driver claimed back and knee injuries, including disc herniations and a meniscus tear, while the minor passengers reported back pain. The plaintiffs alleged both defendants negligently failed to keep a proper lookout, control speed, and brake in time.
During the trial, the driver testified that the first defendant's SUV rear-ended their vehicle, followed by a lighter impact from the second defendant's car striking the SUV. Plaintiffs' counsel sought to assign 90 percent comparative responsibility to the first defendant and 10 percent to the second defendant. The first defendant, however, contended that the second defendant rear-ended her, pushing her into the plaintiffs' vehicle, and sought to place sole blame on the second defendant. The second defendant's testimony aligned with the plaintiffs' account, stating the first defendant initially struck the plaintiffs' vehicle, and she then lightly rear-ended the first defendant. The second defendant's counsel presented evidence of minor rear damage but significant front damage to the first defendant's SUV, arguing the compact car could not have caused the extensive front damage to the larger SUV.
After two days of trial and two and a half hours of deliberation, the jury found only the first defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $32,709.52. The driver received damages for past medical costs, property damage, and past physical pain and suffering. One minor passenger received awards for past medical costs, past physical pain and suffering, and past mental anguish, while the other received past medical costs and past physical pain and suffering. The jury found the plaintiffs should take nothing against the second defendant.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.