Bexar County Jury Awards $7 Million in Rear-End Collision
One driver was slowing down in traffic when their car was hit from behind by a pickup truck. The driver who was hit suffered serious injuries to their aorta, back, hip, lungs, neck, and rib cage. The lawsuit alleged the truck driver was speeding and possibly distracted, and the employer was negligent in supervision and vehicle entrustment. The jury found the defendants liable for the accident and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Spinal Cord Injury Injuries
Spinal cord injuries are among the most catastrophic outcomes of car accidents, potentially resulting in partial or complete paralysis. These injuries require extensive medical care and significantly impact quality of life.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,000,000
- County
- Bexar County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $7,000,000 is below the median of $25,955,498 for spinal cord injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,000,000 to $67,470,000, based on 23 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On August 15, 2019, a floor installer was severely injured when his vehicle was struck from behind by a pickup truck on Interstate 37 in Bexar County. The collision occurred as the plaintiff was decelerating in traffic. The impact resulted in severe injuries, including an aorta pseudoaneurysm, multiple spinal and rib fractures, a hip contusion, and lung collapses. The plaintiff underwent four surgeries, including aortic repair, lung drainage, rib fixation, and spinal fusion, during a 16-day hospitalization, with further medical care and extensive physical therapy required.
The injured driver filed a lawsuit against the pickup truck driver and his employer, Allways Auto Group Ltd. The plaintiff alleged the driver was negligent and grossly negligent, and that the employer was liable through vicarious responsibility because the accident occurred during job duties. The plaintiff also claimed the employer was grossly negligent in its supervision and entrustment of its vehicle to the driver.
Evidence presented included data from the vehicles' airbag control modules, which indicated the truck was traveling at 71 mph and the plaintiff's vehicle at 4 mph at the moment of impact. Witnesses testified the truck driver had been speeding and weaving through traffic, and the plaintiff claimed the driver was watching a video on a cell phone. The defense acknowledged the driver's negligence but denied the employer's responsibility or negligence. The driver claimed he was distracted by traffic and denied watching a video, with a defense expert opining that cell phone data usage did not support the video claim. The defense also argued the plaintiff's non-economic damages were excessive and that he could perform sedentary work.
After a five-day trial in Bexar County, the jury found both the driver and the employer liable for the accident. The jury allocated 80 percent of the liability to the driver and 20 percent to Allways Auto Group based on negligent entrustment and supervision. The jury rejected the claims of gross negligence against both defendants. The plaintiff was awarded $7 million in damages.
Understanding This Case
- Spinal cord injuries are typically permanent, though some incomplete injuries may see partial recovery. Life expectancy may be reduced, and quality of life is significantly impacted.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Bexar County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2021, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Bexar County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.