Verdictly
Settlement
Jefferson County • 2015

Beaumont Underinsured Motorist Claim Settles for $35,000

One driver was stopped in traffic when another vehicle rear-ended them at high speed. The impact pushed the first vehicle into other cars and a barrier. The occupants of the first vehicle sought underinsured motorist benefits from their own insurance company after settling with the at-fault driver's insurer. One occupant sustained foot fractures, while the other had a head injury and a nose laceration.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Leg / Foot Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$35,000
County
Jefferson County, TX
Resolved
2015

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Leg / Foot Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $35,000 is near the median of $250,000 for leg / foot injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $28,631 to $300,000, based on 14 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In Beaumont, Texas, a driver and their spouse were involved in a severe multi-vehicle collision on Highway 69 near the Texas 105 overpass. Their sedan was stopped in traffic when it was rear-ended at high speed by another vehicle, pushing it into multiple other vehicles and then into a highway barrier. The plaintiffs were transported to an emergency room by ambulance.

Following the incident, the plaintiffs settled with the at-fault driver's liability insurer. They then sought underinsured motorist benefits from their own insurer, the defendant. After failing to reach a settlement, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendant insurer for the underinsured motorist benefits. One plaintiff sustained a closed head injury with memory impairment, abrasions, and a laceration requiring an overnight hospital stay and follow-up neurological care. This plaintiff's medical bills totaled approximately $13,000 and damages for past pain and suffering were sought. The other plaintiff suffered undiagnosed foot fractures that were identified six weeks later by a second orthopedic surgeon, leading to a foot boot and medical bills of about $8,300. This plaintiff sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.

The defendant insurer did not dispute the at-fault driver's negligence but argued that one plaintiff recovered well with minimal treatment and that the other plaintiff's medical records did not support claims of surgical recommendations or severe future limitations. The defendant applied credits from the initial liability settlement. The case ultimately concluded in a settlement for $35,000.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Jefferson County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

74
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Jefferson County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case