Anderson County Jury Awards $11.2M in Intoxicated Driving Rollover
One driver was operating a truck when it left the road and rolled over. The driver was convicted of intoxication assault. The passenger sustained a spinal cord injury resulting in paralysis. The passenger sued the driver for negligence, the truck owner for negligent entrustment, and the vehicle manufacturer for products liability. The passenger's counsel argued the driver's intoxication and a potential defect in the seat belt caused the injuries. The defense argued comparative liability, suggesting the passenger was aware of the driver's intoxication and may have been a distraction. The truck owner settled before trial.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Spinal Cord Injury Injuries
Spinal cord injuries are among the most catastrophic outcomes of car accidents, potentially resulting in partial or complete paralysis. These injuries require extensive medical care and significantly impact quality of life.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $18,745,001
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Rollover
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $18,745,001 is near the median of $25,955,498 for spinal cord injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $7,000,000 to $67,470,000, based on 23 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On January 26, 2012, a passenger in a 2002 Ford F-450 sustained severe injuries when the vehicle, driven by an employee, left Highway 155 in Anderson County and rolled over. The driver was later convicted of intoxicated assault, and the plaintiff passenger became paralyzed. The plaintiff filed suit, alleging vehicular negligence and gross negligence against the driver, negligent entrustment against the employer that owned the truck, and products liability against the vehicle manufacturer.
The plaintiff's legal team asserted the driver lost control due to intoxication, noting his blood alcohol content was .135 after the crash. They also argued that a manufacturing defect in the truck's seat belts contributed to the injuries. The driver denied negligence, claiming the plaintiff knew of his intoxication and distracted him just before the collision. The employer argued the driver was not acting within the scope of employment and lacked authorization to use the company truck. Prior to trial, the employer settled for an undisclosed amount. The vehicle manufacturer was granted summary judgment after the truck was sold for scrap before it could be inspected by experts.
The plaintiff's spinal cord was severed, resulting in permanent paralysis from the waist down, and future medical costs were projected at $5 million. The plaintiff sought $20 million for various damages, including pain, suffering, and impairment, plus punitive damages. Defense counsel contended the plaintiff was receiving adequate care and did not require future nursing care, suggesting a $3 million award was reasonable. After a four-day trial, the jury found the driver 60 percent liable and the plaintiff 40 percent liable, also finding the driver grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $18,745,001, which was reduced to $11,247,001 due to comparative liability. A $1 punitive damages award was struck by the presiding judge, citing a lack of unanimous finding on gross negligence.
Understanding This Case
- Spinal cord injuries are typically permanent, though some incomplete injuries may see partial recovery. Life expectancy may be reduced, and quality of life is significantly impacted.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.