292 New York car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was in a rear-end collision that pushed their vehicle into oncoming traffic, resulting in a head-on crash with another vehicle. The injured person suffered a fractured kneecap and developed arthritis after the accident.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The person in the rear-ended vehicle sustained a back injury. The case was settled.

One driver was stopped at an intersection when another driver struck their vehicle from behind. The driver who was hit claimed the impact caused permanent injuries, including disc bulges and herniations in their neck and lower back. They underwent surgery for their neck injuries. The other driver argued the plaintiff stopped abruptly and that the injuries were pre-existing. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.

A passenger in a car was injured when a tractor-trailer struck the car, causing it to lose control and be hit again by another vehicle. The passenger claimed the tractor-trailer driver was negligent. The defense argued the injuries were due to pre-existing conditions. The case settled before trial.

One driver hit another vehicle from behind. The person in the first vehicle sustained injuries to their back and shoulder. The case went to a jury.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The crash caused injuries. The case was settled.

One driver was rear-ended by a sanitation truck. The collision caused a herniated disc in the driver's neck, along with other spinal issues. The case resulted in a jury verdict for the injured driver.

One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was hit from behind in a chain-reaction crash. The driver claimed injuries to their back, neck, shoulders, and knees, requiring surgery. The other driver questioned the extent of the injuries, noting minimal damage to the plaintiff's car. The case involved a dispute over whether the accident caused the claimed medical issues and future lost earnings.

One driver stopped at a red light and was hit from behind by another driver. The second driver claimed the first driver stopped short after the intersection. The first driver stated that even if that were true, the second driver was still at fault for following too closely. The first driver said she suffered injuries to her neck and back that required surgery and caused permanent pain and limitations.

One driver stopped on a bridge due to another vehicle making a U-turn. The driver's van was then struck from behind by a trailing car. This was part of a chain-reaction accident involving five vehicles. The driver claimed injuries to his back and neck.

A car turned left and hit a bicycle that had the right-of-way in a crosswalk. The cyclist was thrown from the bike and sustained severe injuries. The cyclist claimed the driver was negligent. The case was settled.

A driver was rear-ended at a stop light and sued the other driver. The collision caused significant damage to the first driver's car and resulted in injuries to their spine. The case went to trial to determine damages, as liability was already established. The jury awarded a substantial amount for pain and suffering and medical expenses.