Verdictly
Verdict-Defense
Jefferson County • 2022

Louisville, Kentucky Jury Awards $7,463 After Rear-End Collision

One driver was visiting family when they were rear-ended by another driver. The collision caused minor damage and resulted in the injured driver being taken to the hospital for treatment of soft-tissue symptoms and a bruised knee. After returning home, the injured driver was diagnosed with a lumbar disc injury and underwent treatment, including an injection that did not provide relief. The injured driver continued to experience occasional flare-ups. The case involved a dispute over the extent of the injuries and medical expenses, with the defense arguing the forces of the crash were insufficient to cause serious injury.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Defense
Amount
$7,463
County
Jefferson County, KY
Resolved
2022

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-defense of $7,463 is above the median of Undisclosed for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-defense. The typical range is Undisclosed to Undisclosed, based on 56 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On November 23, 2018, the plaintiff, then age 61, was involved in a rear-end collision at an intersection in Louisville, Kentucky. The plaintiff was transported to a local hospital, treated for soft-tissue symptoms and a bruised knee, and released. Following six weeks of physical therapy, the plaintiff was diagnosed with a lumbar disc injury and underwent an epidural steroid injection that did not provide relief.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking damages from the defendant, alleging the collision caused their injuries. The plaintiff claimed $27,185 in medical bills and sought an additional $100,000 for pain and suffering, with a medical expert confirming the injuries. The defendant admitted fault for the collision but disputed the severity of the plaintiff's claimed injuries. A biomechanics expert testified for the defense, asserting that the crash forces were minor and could not have caused a serious injury, suggesting at worst a temporary soft-tissue injury.

The jury first determined that the plaintiff met the necessary threshold of reasonably necessary medical expenses to recover damages. However, when considering the amount of damages, the jury awarded the plaintiff $7,463 for medical expenses, which covered initial emergency treatment. The jury awarded no damages for pain and suffering. The outcome indicated the jury accepted the defendant's argument that the minor collision did not cause the more severe, lasting injuries claimed by the plaintiff, limiting the recovery to immediate, emergency medical care.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Jefferson County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2022, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

62
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Jefferson County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case