700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was stopped to make a left turn when another driver rear-ended them. The defendant admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent of the injuries. The jury determined that one of the passengers did not sustain a permanent injury.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while traveling on a road. The injured person sustained a bulging disc in their neck and a soft tissue injury to their lower back. The defense argued the injuries were from a prior accident.

One driver was stopped at a green light when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver experienced headaches, neck pain, and low back pain. The case involved a dispute over outstanding chiropractic bills and whether the treatment was reasonable and necessary. The matter was settled.

Two drivers were involved in a car crash at an intersection. One driver claimed to have sustained a permanent injury. The other driver denied responsibility for any damages. An expert testified about the injury.

One driver's vehicle allegedly rear-ended another vehicle at an intersection. The jury found that the defendant's negligence caused loss to one plaintiff but that this plaintiff did not sustain a permanent injury. The jury also found that the defendant's negligence did not cause loss to the other plaintiff.

A driver was rear-ended by another vehicle in St. Johns County, Florida. The collision was caused by the negligence of the driver who struck the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff sustained injuries that were described as both temporary and permanent. The defendant's employer was held responsible for the driver's actions.

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rolled into their vehicle. The first driver alleged injuries from the impact. The second driver disputed the extent of the injury and whether it was permanent.

One driver stopped at an intersection and was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who stopped claimed injuries to their neck and back, and carpal tunnel syndrome. The other driver argued the stop was sudden. A jury found in favor of the injured driver.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle while stopped in traffic. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their neck and shoulder. The case proceeded to trial on the issues of permanency and damages.

One driver was stopped for a school bus with its stop signs extended. The other driver then struck the stopped vehicle from behind. The driver who was rear-ended alleged the other driver was not paying attention and failed to stop for the school bus. The second driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent and permanence of the injuries claimed.

One driver was traveling north when the trailer their vehicle was pulling was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries, but the other driver disputed the extent of the damages and whether the injury was permanent. The case was settled.

One driver rear-ended another driver's vehicle at an intersection. The jury determined that the collision caused damage to the injured driver. However, the jury also found that the injury was not permanent.