700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was operating a vehicle at an intersection when the other driver allegedly failed to stop for a red light and rear-ended her vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to her cervical spine and aggravation of a pre-existing condition, requiring surgery. The second driver admitted fault for the collision but disputed the extent and permanence of the injuries.

One driver was traveling on a highway when another vehicle collided with her car. The drivers admitted fault for the crash but disagreed on the extent of the injured person's damages. The case went to trial, but the parties reached a settlement before a final judgment was rendered.

On January 26, 1999, a driver was rear-ended by another vehicle, which then pushed her car into the vehicle in front. The defendant disputed liability and claimed the injured person was at fault.

One driver was operating a vehicle when another driver rear-ended them. The second driver alleged the first driver cut them off. The injured driver had an insurance policy for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage.

One driver was operating a vehicle south on a road in Orlando. The other driver's employee abruptly changed lanes and rear-ended the first driver's vehicle. The jury found the defendant's employee was negligent and caused damage to the plaintiff. However, the jury also found the plaintiff did not sustain a permanent injury from the accident.

One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver struck their vehicle from behind. The collision caused damage to the impact absorber system of the first vehicle. The injured driver sustained disc herniations and sprain/strain injuries to their neck and back.

One driver was rear-ended by another vehicle near an intersection. The injured driver had uninsured motorist coverage with the defendant insurance company. The insurance company disputed the extent of the injuries and permanent damage, and raised defenses of contributory negligence and third-party negligence. The jury awarded damages for past medical expenses but found no permanent injury.

One driver was traveling on I-95 when another driver rear-ended their vehicle. The injured driver had an insurance policy with the defendant for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. The case involved multiple medical and economic experts.

One driver was operating a truck when their vehicle was rear-ended by another car. The impact caused the driver to strike their head on the rear window. The case involved uninsured motorist coverage and a prior settlement with the at-fault driver.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle in Miami. The injured driver had uninsured motorist coverage with their insurance company. The case involved a dispute over the extent of the injuries, with the defense alleging only soft tissue damage.

One driver was traveling south when her vehicle was hit from behind by an unidentified vehicle that left the scene. The injured driver had pre-existing back issues and claimed her condition worsened. The jury found the hit-and-run driver caused the accident but that the injured driver did not sustain a permanent injury.

One driver's vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle at an intersection. The injured person had a pre-existing condition that was made worse by the crash. The case involved uninsured motorist coverage.