One driver stopped for traffic in a parking lot when the other driver crashed into the back of their vehicle. The second driver received a citation for careless driving and admitted fault before the trial. The case focused on the extent of the injured driver's damages.
On September 12, 2003, one driver rear-ended another driver's vehicle at an intersection. Liability was admitted. The jury determined that the injured person did not sustain a permanent injury from the accident.
Two separate car crashes occurred in Orlando, Florida. In the first crash, one driver rear-ended another. In the second crash, a different driver also rear-ended a vehicle where one of the original drivers was a passenger. The injured driver alleged serious and permanent injuries, including cognitive brain injury and headaches, and claimed he could no longer work. His spouse also claimed loss of services and companionship.
One driver filed suit against an insurance carrier for benefits after two rear-end collisions. The insurance carrier admitted the other drivers were negligent but argued the impacts were minimal and did not cause permanent injury. The plaintiff alleged injuries including brain injury, headaches, and neck pain, preventing him from working. The defense presented experts who testified the injuries were not accident-related and predated the collisions. The jury found the plaintiff did not sustain a permanent injury and awarded past medical expenses only.
One driver was waiting to make a left turn when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The defendants claimed the injured person was not hurt and argued comparative negligence. The jury determined the injured person did not sustain a permanent injury.
One driver was operating a vehicle at an intersection when it collided with the rear-end of another vehicle. Liability was admitted. The injured person experienced soft tissue injury to the neck and headaches.
One driver was stopped at an intersection when their vehicle was hit from behind by another driver. The injured driver had a cervical spine injury that required multiple surgeries. The case involved disputes over permanent injury and attorney fees.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle while a passenger in a taxi. The passenger claimed injuries from the collision, including a spinal fracture. The defense argued the injuries were not caused by this crash, citing prior and subsequent accidents. The court found the taxi driver liable, and the jury awarded damages for pain, suffering, and medical expenses.
One driver was operating a leased vehicle when another driver allegedly rear-ended their vehicle. The injured driver claimed their insurance company refused to pay underinsured motorist and bodily injury policy limits. The jury found the second driver's negligence caused the injury but also found the injured driver did not suffer a permanent injury.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, which then struck the car in front. The jury determined the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury from the crash.
One driver was operating a vehicle in Bartow when they were struck in the rear by another vehicle. The injured person sustained soft tissue injuries to their neck and lower back.
One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended their vehicle. The injured person sustained injuries to their neck, back, and knee, requiring surgery.
Miami-Dade County • 2008
Geography
Where Florida Cases Are Filed
Settlement amounts can vary significantly by location within Florida.
Key legal rules that affect how Florida car accident claims are valued and resolved.
Fault System
Modified Comparative Fault (51% bar, effective 2023)
Statute of Limitations
2 years from the date of the accident (effective 2023)
Minimum Liability
$25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident / $10,000 property damage
Florida transitioned from a no-fault to an at-fault system in 2024. The state now uses modified comparative fault—if you are more than 50% at fault, you cannot recover damages.
The statute of limitations was reduced from 4 years to 2 years in 2023 under tort reform legislation.
Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage is no longer required for new policies, but existing policies may still include it during the transition period.
FAQ
Florida Car Accident Settlement FAQs
Answers based on real Florida case data and state law.
Important: The information provided on this page is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. Always consult with a qualified Florida attorney for guidance specific to your situation.