700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver's vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle at an intersection. The injured driver had an uninsured/underinsured motorist policy with the defendant insurance company. The jury determined the accident caused the injuries, but the injured driver did not sustain a permanent injury.

One driver rear-ended a stopped vehicle at a red light. The injured person's doctors testified that the collision aggravated a pre-existing back condition, requiring surgery. The defense argued the low-impact collision could not have caused these injuries.

One driver was stopped at a mall exit waiting to enter the highway when the other driver rear-ended them. The collision had minimal property damage. The injured person experienced disc issues in their neck and jaw.

One driver alleged that another driver rear-ended her vehicle while she was stopped in traffic at a red light. The injured driver was not wearing a seat belt at the time of the accident. The other driver was uninsured, and the injured driver's own insurance company denied her claims.

One driver was stopped at an intersection when their vehicle was hit from behind by another truck. The driver of the second truck was allegedly working for the owner of the truck at the time of the collision. The owner denied liability and ownership of the truck.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle on June 12, 2003. The injured person sustained injuries to their neck and right ankle.

One driver's vehicle was hit from behind at an intersection. The driver of the other vehicle was not found. The injured person claimed muscle injuries to their shoulder and neck, and developed headaches. They later required injections and pain medication.

A driver was rear-ended by another vehicle owned by their employer. The collision caused injuries to the driver and loss of consortium for their spouse. The case involved claims of negligence and motor vehicle safety.

One driver was operating a vehicle in Gainesville, Florida, when another driver rear-ended her. The driver who was hit alleged she sustained injuries, and her spouse claimed loss of consortium damages. The case proceeded to trial, and the court granted a directed verdict for the plaintiff on liability. The jury determined that the plaintiff did not sustain a permanent injury.

One driver was stopped on the road when the other driver hit them from behind. The collision caused minimal damage to the vehicles. The main issue at trial was whether the accident caused the injured driver's medical condition and subsequent surgery. The jury decided the accident was the cause and awarded damages.

On December 14, 1995, one driver was operating her vehicle at an intersection when she was rear-ended by another driver. The driver who caused the collision was operating a vehicle owned by a taxi company and was working at the time.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle while it was stopped at an intersection. The occupants of the stopped vehicle sustained injuries requiring surgery. One occupant was unable to work for several months and missed a promotion. The other occupant also had surgery for a hand injury.