700 Florida car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver was stopped in traffic when another vehicle rear-ended them, pushing their car into the vehicle in front. The collision caused significant damage to the rear of the first car. The injured driver alleged the impact caused lasting pain and injury.

One driver was operating a vehicle on a state road at an intersection when their vehicle was struck by another vehicle. The injured driver was covered by uninsured/underinsured motorist insurance. The case was settled at mediation.

One driver rear-ended a vehicle, causing a chain reaction that pushed the injured person's car into the car in front of them. The injured person claimed injuries to their neck and back, as well as a soft tissue injury to their ankle. The jury found that the injured person did not suffer a permanent injury.

One driver was rear-ended in a four-vehicle collision. The case focused on whether the injuries were permanent and the amount of damages. The jury awarded the plaintiff money for their injuries.

One driver was traveling southbound on a highway when another driver merged into their lane and collided with their vehicle. The injured driver alleged their automobile insurer refused to pay the full value of their claim and delayed the process.

One driver was stopped for traffic when the driver behind them rear-ended their vehicle. This caused the first vehicle to then rear-end the vehicle in front of it. The injured driver had neck, head, and shoulder injuries.

One driver was stopped at an intersection when their vehicle was rear-ended by another car. This pushed the stopped vehicle into the car in front of it. The injured driver filed claims for uninsured motorist benefits. The defense argued the injuries were not significant or were pre-existing.

One driver was traveling when another driver rear-ended a vehicle in front of them. That vehicle was pushed into the first driver's car. The first driver claimed the impact caused permanent injuries, including disc issues in her back and neck. The other driver disputed the extent of the injuries, presenting an expert who believed the injuries were not traumatic. A jury found in favor of the first driver.

One driver stopped for traffic and was rear-ended by another vehicle, causing a chain reaction. Later, a different driver collided with the injured person's vehicle at an intersection.