Verdictly
Settlement
Gadsden County • 2004

Tallahassee Jury Issues Verdict in Rear-End Collision

One driver struck another vehicle from behind while it was stopped at a red light. The collision occurred at an intersection. The injured person reported injuries to their neck, lower back, and left knee.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Neck Injury (Whiplash)
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Neck Injury (Whiplash) Injuries

Whiplash is a neck injury caused by rapid back-and-forth movement of the head, commonly occurring in rear-end collisions. Despite being frequently dismissed, whiplash can cause significant pain and disability.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$25,500
County
Gadsden County, FL
Resolved
2004

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Neck Injury (Whiplash)
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $25,500 is near the median of $19,000 for neck injury (whiplash) cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $6,287 to $115,000, based on 63 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On September 27, 2000, a vehicle owned by the defendant and operated with permission rear-ended the plaintiff's car on Highway 90 at the intersection of Capital Circle in Tallahassee. The plaintiff reported that her vehicle was stopped in the left turn lane, awaiting a red turn arrow, when the collision occurred.

The plaintiff subsequently alleged the driver of the defendant's vehicle was not paying attention, and she denied obstructing the intersection or running a red light. The defendant claimed the plaintiff's injuries were contributed to by her failure to wear a seat belt. Details regarding the resolution or verdict of this case were not available.

Understanding This Case

  • Most whiplash injuries improve within 2-3 months. However, about 25% of patients experience chronic symptoms lasting over a year, significantly impacting quality of life.
  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Gadsden County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2004, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

78
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Gadsden County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case