Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Miami-Dade County • 2016

Miami-Dade County Jury Awards $1,955,000 in Rear-End Collision

One driver was rear-ended in a motor vehicle accident. The driver who caused the collision admitted fault. The injured driver claimed the accident caused disc herniations in her neck, leading to ongoing pain and disability. She also alleged the accident caused her to relapse into alcohol abuse and become addicted to pain medication. The defense argued the injuries were not permanent and unrelated to the accident, attributing her issues to other factors and prior accidents. The jury found the injured driver sustained a permanent injury and awarded damages.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Insurance Obligation

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$1,955,000
County
Miami-Dade County, FL
Resolved
2016

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Insurance Obligation, Vehicle negligence, Medical negligence, Insurance obligation

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $1,955,000 is above the median of $60,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $229,900, based on 396 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In October 2006, a rear-end motor vehicle accident occurred on Okeechobee Boulevard in Miami-Dade County, leading to a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff sued the estate of the at-fault driver, who died of unrelated causes prior to trial and whose estate stipulated to negligence in causing the collision. The plaintiff also sued her own underinsured motorist carrier.

The plaintiff claimed the collision caused three disc herniations in her cervical spine, resulting in continuing neck pain and limited motion, for which she underwent epidural injections. She also contended the injuries led to a relapse into alcohol abuse and addiction to painkilling drugs, despite a prior history of depression, anxiety, and being a recovering alcoholic. The plaintiff sought $63,497 in past medical expenses.

The defendants contested the causation and permanency of the plaintiff's injuries, as well as the reasonableness of past medical expenses and the need for future treatment. They argued that a settling third-party driver, who allegedly struck the at-fault driver's car and pushed it into the plaintiff's vehicle, was also negligent. The defense presented evidence that the impact was minor, noting no airbag deployment, and that the plaintiff drove home an hour after the accident without going to the emergency room or seeking medical treatment for three days. The defense also pointed to the plaintiff's involvement in three other accidents within six months of the subject collision, occurring before MRI films were taken, and noted that medical records showed no complaints of neck injuries during subsequent hospital admissions. Defendants further contended that the plaintiff's medical records did not support the claim that the accident caused her alcohol relapse.

A jury found that the plaintiff sustained a permanent injury as a result of the accident and awarded $1,955,000 in damages. However, the jury declined to award damages for past pain and suffering.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Miami-Dade County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

28
/100
Potentially Unfair

This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to understand your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Miami-Dade County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case