Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Miami-Dade County • 2024

Miami Court Rules New Trial After $120,000 UM Award

Two people were in a car when another driver hit them from behind. The impact caused their car to hit a tree. The driver who caused the crash then drove away. The people in the first car claimed they were injured and sought damages under their uninsured motorist insurance policy. The insurance company argued the injuries were not permanent and were due to pre-existing conditions. A jury awarded damages to the plaintiffs.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Insurance Obligation

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$120,000
County
Miami-Dade County, FL
Resolved
2024

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Insurance Obligation

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $120,000 is near the median of $60,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $229,900, based on 396 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In Miami, Florida, a driver and passenger were involved in a collision at the intersection of SW 137th Avenue and SW 75th Street when an unknown vehicle rear-ended their car, causing it to strike a tree. The at-fault driver fled the scene. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit against their uninsured motorist insurer, asserting claims under their policy for significant, permanent injuries.

The defendant initially contested liability and the extent of damages but accepted liability prior to trial. The plaintiffs contended the collision caused multi-level disc herniations requiring ongoing treatment. The defendant argued the injuries were pre-existing and not permanent or caused by the crash. A jury found in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding $120,000 in total ($60,000 to each plaintiff) for past medical expenses only.

Following the verdict, plaintiffs' counsel discovered a juror had misrepresented her litigation history and residency during voir dire. The juror had failed to disclose multiple DUI convictions and a prior lawsuit, along with providing false residency information. The plaintiffs argued this concealment was material and would have prompted them to use a peremptory strike. The court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a new trial, which is pending.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Miami-Dade County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2024, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

50
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Miami-Dade County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case