Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Manatee County • 2007

Jury Finds Negligence in Left Turn Collision, Awards $453,500

One driver alleged the other driver made a left turn and hit the rear of his car. The second driver denied fault. The second driver died before the trial. The first driver, who had prior severe back and neck injuries from an airplane crash, claimed the car accident re-injured his neck and lower back. The defense argued the driver's spine issues were from the prior crash and not caused by the car accident. The jury found the second driver at fault and awarded damages.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
TRAFFIC VIOLATION

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$453,500
County
Manatee County, FL
Resolved
2007

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
TRAFFIC VIOLATION, Vehicle negligence, Surgical negligence, Damages

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $453,500 is above the median of $60,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $229,900, based on 396 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit after a motor vehicle accident where the defendant allegedly made a left turn, violated the plaintiff's right-of-way, and struck the rear driver's side of the plaintiff's vehicle. The 72-year-old plaintiff claimed he was driving straight through an intersection when the defendant, attempting to turn left onto an I-95 ramp, collided with his car. Despite minor property damage, the plaintiff described the impact as violent.

The defendant denied liability in a pre-trial deposition but died before trial from unrelated causes. The defense subsequently disputed the plaintiff's claimed injuries and their causation. The plaintiff, who had severe neck and lower back injuries from a 1992 airplane crash and had undergone prior spinal surgery, argued that his prior disability had largely resolved. He contended the accident caused a re-injury, leading to a lumbar laminectomy and a recommendation for future cervical surgery.

The defense argued the plaintiff's spinal issues stemmed from extreme degeneration due to the 1992 crash, noting ongoing treatment and medication at the time of the car accident. A defense neurosurgeon testified that the plaintiff's cervical symptoms appeared significantly after the accident, indicating a continuation of prior problems. The neurosurgeon opined that the lumbar condition and surgery were not causally related to the car accident. A defense radiologist reported unchanged radiographic studies before and after the collision.

The jury found the defendant 100% negligent and awarded the plaintiff $453,500 in damages. This award comprised $39,500 in economic damages and $414,000 for pain and suffering. A PIP off-set was applied.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Manatee County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2007, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

42
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Manatee County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case