Verdictly
GG
Unclaimed Profile

Glaze & Garrett, PLLC

TX
4 documented cases
$45k
Median Settlement
4
Documented Cases
TX
State

Case data from 2019 to 2022

Overview

Glaze & Garrett, PLLC is a TX-based personal injury law firm with 4 documented car accident cases in Verdictly's database, spanning from 2019 to 2022. Their cases include injuries such as back strain / soft tissue, cervical disc injury. The firm has handled cases across 2 counties in TX, including Harris, Dallas.

Interested in working with Glaze & Garrett, PLLC?

Submit your information and we'll help connect you.

Case Types Handled

Accident types:

T-boneRear-end

Sample Cases by Glaze & Garrett, PLLC

Won Case

$55k

Back Strain / Soft TissueRear-end

One driver was traveling north and another was traveling south. The northbound driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle was involved in a collision with the southbound vehicle. The occupants of the northbound vehicle claimed they suffered injuries. The lawsuit alleged the southbound driver was negligent in the operation of their vehicle, specifically in making a left turn in front of the northbound vehicle. The police report listed failing to yield the right of way while turning left as a contributing factor for the southbound driver.

Harris County2019
View details →
Won Case

$45k

Cervical Disc InjuryRear-end

One driver was traveling northbound and stopped at an intersection. The other driver, operating a bus, attempted a right turn and struck the stopped vehicle on its rear quarter panel. The collision caused injuries to the neck and back. The jury awarded past medical expenses and damages for pain and suffering.

Dallas County2022
View details →
Won Case

$6k

Cervical Disc InjuryRear-end

One driver was traveling northbound on a road when another driver rear-ended her, pushing her vehicle into the one in front. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back and neck, including disc issues and spinal cord indentation. The other driver admitted to adjusting his air conditioner before the collision. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the extent of the injuries given a prior accident and the chosen treatment methods.

Harris County2019
View details →

Note: This snapshot is based on publicly documented cases in Verdictly's database and may not represent the firm's complete case history or current practice areas. Contact the firm directly for the most accurate information.

Is this your firm?

Claim your profile to verify your firm's information and manage how you appear on Verdictly.