Uvalde, Texas Jury Awards $73,000 in UIM Dispute
One driver attempted a left turn and was struck by another vehicle. The passenger in the second vehicle claimed injuries to her neck, back, knee, and head. The case proceeded on causation and damages after a settlement with the other driver's insurance. The passenger sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and physical impairment.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $73,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- leg, back, sprain
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $73,000 is near the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A vehicle collision occurred on February 13, 2013, in Uvalde, Texas. The plaintiff was a passenger in a sedan when an oncoming vehicle attempted a left turn and was struck on its passenger side. The other driver received a citation for failing to yield the right of way. The plaintiff reported multiple injuries to the neck, back, knee, and head, and subsequently settled with the at-fault driver's insurer for $75,000, exhausting a $100,000 liability policy.
The plaintiff then filed a lawsuit against her own insurer, National General Insurance Company, seeking underinsured motorist benefits. She asserted that the incident caused cervical bulging discs, lumbar sprains, a right knee injury, and headaches, leading to emergency room visits, chiropractic care, physical therapy, and arthroscopic knee surgery. The plaintiff sought $40,587.07 for past medical expenses, and projected future costs for knee replacement surgery and continued neck and back therapy.
National General did not contest the other driver's negligence but disputed the causation and extent of the plaintiff's damages. The defense highlighted a significant treatment gap after the knee surgery and pointed to degenerative conditions visible on MRI scans. The insurer also argued the plaintiff was inattentive before the collision, questioning her credibility regarding causation.
Following a one-day trial, a jury deliberated for 2.5 hours and awarded the plaintiff $73,000 for past medical costs, future medical costs, past physical impairment, and past pain and suffering. However, the plaintiff received no additional payment from her underinsured motorist policy. The court applied offsets for the $100,000 already received from the at-fault driver's policy and $2,500 in personal injury protection payments made by National General, resulting in no remaining UIM benefit owed.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.