Texas Jury Awards $37,218 in Negligence Rear-End Collision
One driver was passing another vehicle on the highway when they collided. The passengers in the struck vehicle claimed injuries. One passenger settled her claim before trial. The other passenger proceeded to trial, seeking damages for neck and back pain. The jury awarded her past medical expenses and past physical pain.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $37,218
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Chiropractic, Lumbar Facet Injury, Sprain
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $37,218 is above the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On May 23, 2015, a collision occurred on Interstate 10 in Texas when a defendant driver, operating a Chevrolet Cruze, struck the left rear of a Chrysler 300 in which two plaintiffs were passengers. One plaintiff was seated in the back seat. Both plaintiffs claimed neck and back injuries. The passengers subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, failing to stay in a single lane, and unsafe lane changes.
Prior to trial, one of the plaintiffs settled for an undisclosed amount through mediation. For the remaining plaintiff, the defense stipulated that the defendant driver's negligence caused the accident, and the case proceeded solely on the issue of damages. The defendant driver reportedly did not cooperate or attend the trial. The plaintiff sought $19,218 for past medical expenses and $18,000 for past physical pain, claiming back and neck strains, sprains, and lumbar facet joint pain. The plaintiff's treatment included chiropractic care, a neurologist visit, MRIs, and pain management involving facet joint medial branch blocks. The plaintiff's treating pain management physician testified that the treatments were reasonable and necessary.
The defense, however, argued that the plaintiff's MRIs and later pain management treatments were not medically necessary, citing the plaintiff's initial improvement with chiropractic care and significant gaps in treatment. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that the plaintiff sustained only a sprain/strain injury that should have resolved within a few weeks and that the more advanced treatments were unjustified and unrelated to the accident. After a two-day trial and one hour of deliberation, a jury awarded the plaintiff $37,218, which matched the combined amounts sought for past medical costs and past physical pain.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.