Texas Jury Awards $16,000 Damages in Rear-End Collision
One driver was traveling on a street when another vehicle struck the rear of her car. The injured driver claimed pain in her neck, lower back, and right hand. She alleged the other driver was negligent. The jury found in favor of the injured driver regarding her claimed injuries and damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $16,000
- County
- Gregg County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Soft Tissue, Chiropractic, Epidural Injections
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $16,000 is near the median of $13,021 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,408 to $31,445, based on 800 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On April 29, 2016, a 52-year-old retail manager was traveling eastbound on Kilgore Street near its intersection with U.S. Highway 259 in Texas when her vehicle was struck from the rear by another driver. The plaintiff claimed injuries to her neck, lower back, and right hand. She filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligent operation of a vehicle. The defendant conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issues of the plaintiff's claimed injuries and damages.
The plaintiff presented evidence that she sought immediate medical attention and was later diagnosed with soft tissue injuries to her neck and lower back, along with a sprain to her right dominant hand. She underwent chiropractic care and received epidural injections for her lower back in 2016 and 2018. The plaintiff contended she continued to experience residual pain, required future pain management, and was unable to return to her management position due to lifting restrictions. She sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain and mental anguish, and physical impairment. The defense argued that the plaintiff's injuries were minor sprains that had resolved by the time of trial, noting a lack of objective findings on her MRI beyond pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The defense also highlighted the plaintiff's involvement in a separate automobile collision five months after the initial incident and questioned the disparity in billing for the plaintiff's pain management treatments.
After a one-day trial, a jury deliberated for 30 minutes before awarding the plaintiff $16,000 in damages. The award covered past medical costs, future medical costs, past physical impairment, and past pain and suffering. The jury's decision likely reflected a consideration of both the plaintiff's asserted injuries and the defense's arguments regarding the nature and extent of those injuries, pre-existing conditions, subsequent events, and the costs of care.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Gregg County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2019, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to know what your case might be worth?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Gregg County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.