Mesquite Jury Awards $13,656 After Red-Light Crash
One driver was traveling on a road and passed under a highway. The other driver was approaching from the right. The vehicles collided in an intersection controlled by a traffic signal. One driver claimed injuries to their neck and back, alleging the other driver ran a red light and was distracted by a cell phone GPS. The defense argued the injured driver was speeding and should have avoided the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries
Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $13,656
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $13,656 is below the median of $40,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $18,000 to $100,000, based on 250 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On April 12, 2018, a collision occurred at a signal-controlled intersection on Beltline Road in Mesquite, Texas. The plaintiff, a behavioral therapist, was driving a sedan and passed under Highway 80 when a vehicle operated by the defendant, approaching from the plaintiff’s right, collided with his car. The plaintiff subsequently alleged he suffered neck and back injuries, including herniated intervertebral discs.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, claiming she was negligent in the operation of her vehicle. The plaintiff testified his traffic light was green. Plaintiff’s counsel argued the defendant ran a red light and was distracted by her cell phone’s GPS. The defendant testified she did not know the color of her light and could not see it until entering the intersection because she was behind a tractor-trailer. She denied being distracted, stating her phone was in a cup holder. Defense counsel argued the plaintiff was speeding and could have avoided the accident, suggesting the jury assign 50 percent responsibility to each driver. Evidence presented included photographs of the vehicle damage, which showed at least moderate impact. The plaintiff sought $23,546 for past medical expenses, $156 for past lost wages, and damages for past pain, suffering, and physical impairment.
After a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant liable for the accident, concluding her negligence, and not the plaintiff's, proximately caused the collision. The jury awarded the plaintiff $13,656 in total damages. This included $156 for past lost earnings, $6,750 for past physical impairment, and $6,750 for past physical pain and suffering and mental anguish. Jurors awarded zero for past medical expenses, reportedly indicating they believed health or auto insurance should cover these bills, despite insurance not being mentioned during the trial.
Understanding This Case
- Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2022, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.