Lebanon, TN Jury Awards $1,481,655 in Store Cart Injury
A shopper was struck twice by a Wal-Mart employee pushing a loaded cart. The shopper initially experienced shoulder pain and later developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. The case involved claims of negligence and sought damages for medical expenses, economic losses, and pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $3,431,665
- County
- Dallas County, KY
- Resolved
- 2025
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Shoulder Injury
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Civil Procedure, Real Property Law, Torts
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $3,431,665 is above the median of $65,218 for shoulder injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $25,000 to $198,242, based on 33 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In September 2022, while shopping at a Wal-Mart in Lebanon, TN, a 59-year-old massage therapist from Mt. Juliet, TN, was struck by an Online Pick-up and Delivery cart pushed by an employee. The plaintiff, who was bending down to examine shelving, was hit twice and knocked over by the cart, which was laden with crates. She reported hitting her head and experiencing acute shoulder pain. The plaintiff had a pre-existing wrist injury from a March 2022 motor vehicle accident, which was being treated by a chiropractor. Her shoulder pain persisted, leading to surgery in November 2022 for a labral repair and subsequent procedures on her elbow. A pain management physician in Nashville, TN, later diagnosed her with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, indicating a need for ongoing care.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Wal-Mart in federal court, alleging negligence by the employee in operating the cart. She sought damages for past and future medical expenses, economic losses, and non-economic suffering. The plaintiff's husband also presented a derivative claim for loss of consortium. Wal-Mart denied liability, arguing that the plaintiff's injuries were pre-existing or exacerbated by her earlier car accident, and that the plaintiff failed to maintain a proper lookout. The presiding judge denied the plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict on the issue of her comparative fault.
After a four-day trial, the jury deliberated and returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury found Wal-Mart solely at fault, rejecting any claim of comparative negligence by the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $184,784 for past medical expenses, $475,000 for future medical expenses, $29,295 for past economic damages, $42,612 for future economic damages, $300,000 for past non-economic damages, and $2.3 million for future non-economic damages. The plaintiff's husband was awarded $100,000 for his consortium claim, bringing the total raw verdict to $3,431,665.
However, the final judgment entered by the court was for $1,481,655. This reduction resulted from the application of Tennessee's tort reform statutes, which capped non-economic damages at $750,000. The cap reduced the non-economic damage award by $1.95 million.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2025, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was proceeding through an intersection when their vehicle collided with another vehicle making a left turn. The injured driver claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case involved a claim against the injured driver's own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits after an initial settlement with the at-fault driver's insurer.
One driver sued another for failing to maintain a safe distance and avoid a collision. The defendant claimed the plaintiff was also at fault. The incident occurred when the defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiffs' vehicle from behind. The minor passenger complained of neck, mid-back, and rib pain, diagnosed as muscle sprain and cervicalgia. Further treatment included visits for headaches and pain in the neck and upper back.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.