Houston Jury Awards $911K in Multi-Vehicle Collision
One driver exited a driveway and turned left, striking another vehicle. The initial collision caused the struck vehicle to then hit two other vehicles. The occupants of the first struck vehicle claimed injuries to their backs and necks.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries
Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $911,000
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $911,000 is above the median of $50,756 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $210,000, based on 204 cases in our database.
Case Overview
In February 2017, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on a street in Houston during rush hour. A driver and a passenger were traveling in a compact car when a sedan, exiting an apartment complex driveway, struck their vehicle's right side. The impact caused the compact car to subsequently collide with a vehicle in the middle lane and a bus in the right lane. The driver claimed to have sustained multiple herniated discs and related conditions in their back, while the passenger reported a disc bulge and cervical facet arthropathy with radiating pain in their neck and back.
The driver and passenger filed a lawsuit against the sedan's driver, alleging negligence in the vehicle's operation. They later added their underinsured motorist (UIM) carrier, Auto Club Mutual Insurance Co., as a defendant, seeking UIM benefits. The sedan driver settled with the plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount during litigation, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the UIM claims. At trial, the UIM carrier did not dispute the initial driver's negligence.
The plaintiffs presented evidence of their extensive chiropractic treatment and epidural steroid injections. Both testified about persistent symptoms, work limitations, and reduced earning capacity, supported by expert testimony from a physical therapist regarding permanent impairment and an economist calculating economic damages. The UIM carrier's defense highlighted photographs showing minimal damage to the plaintiffs' vehicle despite the multiple impacts. The defense also questioned the driver's claimed need for assistance at work and disputed the passenger's lost earnings claims, noting the passenger's voluntary leave to care for family and challenging the economist's assumptions about the passenger's future work longevity.
Following a two-day trial and four hours of deliberation, a Houston jury rendered a 5-1 verdict, awarding the plaintiffs $911,000. However, the award did not include damages for physical pain and mental anguish, with jurors indicating a lack of sufficient evidence for these claims. After a $60,000 credit to the UIM carrier, the total damages were reduced to $851,000. The plaintiffs' recovery was ultimately limited to $90,000 by the UIM policy limits.
Understanding This Case
- About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Harris County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2020, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Curious about your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on Interstate 10 when his pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. That second pickup truck had been propelled forward after being struck by a tractor-trailer. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed injuries to his back and neck. The case involved multiple defendants and allegations of negligence in vehicle operation and employer liability.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.