Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2016

Dallas, Texas Jury Awards $16,874.16 in Rear-End Collision

One driver was stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended them. The driver who was rear-ended claimed back and shoulder injuries. The investigating officer testified that the at-fault driver appeared impaired. The at-fault driver admitted to drinking and taking medication before the crash. The jury found gross negligence and awarded damages.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$16,874
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2016

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $16,874 is near the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On April 24, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred at the intersection of McKinnon Street and Wolf Street in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff, stopped at a red light, was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant. The defendant was initially arrested on a charge of driving while intoxicated, but the charge was later dropped after a blood test showed a blood alcohol concentration of .025. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, claiming back and shoulder injuries.

The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by driving under the influence of alcohol, failing to maintain a proper lookout, failing to control speed, following too closely, and failing to brake or turn to avoid the collision. The plaintiff sought damages for past medical bills totaling $12,874.16, six weeks of past physical pain and mental anguish, and $30,000 in punitive damages, predicated on a finding of gross negligence. Plaintiff's counsel argued that the defendant's failure to see and avoid the vehicle indicated impairment.

The defendant stipulated to negligence but disputed gross negligence and impairment. The defendant testified that the plaintiff's vehicle was stopped without its brake lights on. While the defendant admitted to consuming alcohol and taking an antidepressant, and the investigating officer testified to her appearing impaired and failing parts of a field sobriety test, the defendant's blood alcohol content was low, and she passed three of five elements of the field sobriety test. Defense counsel also challenged the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, noting that initial emergency room records contradicted some claims and that the plaintiff had been involved in subsequent accidents.

Following a one-day trial, a jury found the defendant grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $16,874.16, which included damages for past medical costs, past physical pain and mental anguish, and punitive damages.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2016, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

93
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.