Dallas Jury Awards $4,687 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway exit ramp when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. She later underwent breast reduction surgery, which she stated was necessary due to her back pain, and experienced complications from the surgery. The defense argued the surgery was not related to the accident and that her injuries did not limit her activities.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries
Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $4,687
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $4,687 is below the median of $13,353 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,500 to $28,802, based on 1000 cases in our database.
Case Overview
On February 15, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred on an exit ramp of southbound U.S. Highway 75 in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff's 2013 Chevrolet Camaro was stopped in traffic when the defendant's 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK-class coupe struck it from behind. A police report indicated the defendant failed to control speed. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent, citing claims such as failing to control speed, failing to keep a proper lookout, and driving while using a cell phone. The defendant stipulated to liability for the accident on the first day of trial.
The plaintiff sought damages for neck, back, and shoulder injuries. After initial treatment at an emergency room, the plaintiff underwent 1.5 years of treatment for soft-tissue strains and sprains. The plaintiff claimed to have eventually undergone bilateral breast reduction surgery, asserting it was necessary to alleviate back pain resulting from the accident, which then led to an infection requiring a second operation. The plaintiff sought $17,148 for past medical expenses, along with unspecified amounts for past and future physical pain and mental anguish, past physical impairment, and past physical disfigurement, including scarring from the surgery.
The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and the necessity of the breast reduction surgery. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that there was no relationship between the plaintiff's complaints and breast size, and that the surgery was neither indicated nor related to the collision. The defense argued that only $4,437 in medical expenses, covering initial orthopedic visits and physical therapy, was reasonable. The defense also presented evidence of the plaintiff's post-accident travels and social media photos to challenge claims of activity limitations and visible scarring.
After a three-day trial, the jury deliberated for 2.5 hours before returning a 10-2 verdict. The jury awarded the plaintiff $4,687. This award included $4,437 for past medical costs and $250 for past physical pain and mental anguish, aligning closely with the amounts suggested by the defense for necessary treatment related to the accident. The two dissenting jurors reportedly sought to award zero damages.
Understanding This Case
- The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.