Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2015

Dallas Jury Awards $24,742 in Negligent Left Turn Collision

One driver was proceeding straight through an intersection on a green light, while the other driver attempted a left turn. The two vehicles collided. The driver who was proceeding straight claimed neck and lower back sprains and strains. The case involved disputes over the necessity and cost of medical treatments, including injections and chiropractic care, as well as the aggravation of a pre-existing condition.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
T-bone
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$24,743
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2015

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
T-bone
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $24,743 is near the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In July 2012, a mass-transit supervisor was driving south on Harry Hines Boulevard in Dallas when his vehicle collided with an SUV driven by the defendant, who was attempting a left turn at the Houston Street intersection. Both drivers entered the intersection on a green light. The plaintiff's front-left bumper and quarter panel struck the defendant's right-front bumper. The plaintiff later sued the defendant, alleging negligent failure to yield the right of way, maintain a proper lookout, and turn left safely. The defendant stipulated to liability for the collision.

The plaintiff claimed neck and lower back sprains and strains, with pain radiating into his legs. He sought emergency room treatment the day after the accident, followed by chiropractic care for several months. After a gap, he received pain management treatment, including two lumbar epidural steroid injections. The plaintiff, his brother, and a friend testified about ongoing pain and limitations impacting his social life and home care. The plaintiff's pain management doctor testified that the treatments were necessary and accident-related, and the plaintiff sought approximately $20,000 in past medical bills (excluding chiropractic bills that were disallowed), $1,037.20 in past lost wages, future medical costs, and damages for pain and suffering, seeking a total of $375,000.

The defense emphasized a significant gap in the plaintiff's treatment and the lack of treatment since September 2013. Defense arguments also highlighted the plaintiff's prior lumbar complaints and years as a bus driver, suggesting pre-existing conditions. The defense's orthopedic expert opined that the injections were unrelated to the accident and overpriced, while their chiropractic expert stated that only a few chiropractic visits were needed and questioned the original chiropractor's fees.

After a three-day trial, a Dallas jury deliberated for three hours and returned an 11-1 verdict, awarding the plaintiff $24,742.73. The award included $9,059 for past medical costs, $1,037 for past lost earnings, $2,646 for property damage, $4,000 for past physical pain and suffering, and $8,000 for past mental anguish. The jury's award was significantly lower than the amount sought, reflecting, in part, the defense's arguments regarding treatment gaps and the extent of accident-related injuries.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

91
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.