Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2017

Dallas Jury Awards $21,936 in Rear-End Collision

One driver rear-ended another vehicle that was stopped at a red light. The occupants of the stopped vehicle claimed injuries to their necks, backs, and shoulders. The defense argued the impact was minor and the injuries were exaggerated. The jury found the driver who caused the collision negligent and awarded damages to the plaintiffs.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Back Strain / Soft Tissue Injuries

Back strain and soft tissue injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in car accidents. These injuries affect muscles, tendons, and ligaments in the back, often resulting from the sudden impact forces experienced during a collision.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$21,936
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2017

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $21,936 is near the median of $13,980 for back strain / soft tissue cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $5,649 to $30,000, based on 1000 cases in our database.

Case Overview

On October 27, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred in Dallas on the feeder road of U.S. 75. The plaintiffs were stopped, waiting to make a right turn, when their vehicle was struck from behind by the defendant's vehicle. The defendant admitted being in a rush and mistakenly believed the plaintiffs' vehicle had proceeded while he was looking for an opening in traffic. The impact was minor, and no police report was filed.

The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant was negligent for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, follow at a safe distance, and avoid the collision. Both plaintiffs claimed to have sustained multiple injuries, including cervical, lumbar, and thoracic ligamentous and disc injuries, nerve root irritation, and reduced range of motion. One plaintiff reported hitting her head on the steering wheel. Both plaintiffs sought chiropractic treatment and underwent MRIs, with one MRI showing disc protrusions.

The plaintiffs' counsel argued that the minor nature of the impact did not negate the severity of their injuries, attributing any delay in treatment to their busy schedules. They sought specific amounts for past medical bills and additional damages for pain, suffering, and physical impairment. The defense, while not strongly disputing liability for the collision, emphasized the minor impact and contended that the delay in treatment indicated a lack of significant injury. Through "dueling affidavits" from chiropractors, the defense expert argued that much of the plaintiffs' treatment, including MRIs and certain therapies, was not medically necessary, suggesting only a limited number of chiropractic visits were indicated. The defense also noted one plaintiff's prior back injury from a 2010 motor vehicle accident.

A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiffs a total of $21,936. The award included $11,831 for past medical costs and $1,000 for past physical pain and suffering to one plaintiff, and $8,605 for past medical costs and $500 for past physical pain and suffering to the other. The jury's verdict was 10-2.

Understanding This Case

  • The majority of soft tissue injuries resolve within 6-12 weeks with proper treatment. However, approximately 10-20% of cases may develop into chronic conditions requiring ongoing care.
  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Dallas County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2017, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

91
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Dallas County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.