Arizona Jury Awards $9,500,000 in Tire Negligence Rollover
One driver's vehicle rolled over after a tire tread separated. The plaintiff alleged the rental company failed to replace worn tires or warn about prior tire issues. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $9,500,000
- County
- Pima County, AZ
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rollover
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Settlement Context
This verdict-plaintiff of $9,500,000 is above the median of $14,473 for other cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $4,770 to $42,056, based on 190 cases in our database.
Case Overview
A roll-over accident occurred after a tire tread separated, prompting the plaintiff to file a lawsuit alleging negligence. The plaintiff claimed the defendant failed to replace tires or inform the vehicle's leasers about a prior tire tread separation problem on a front wheel.
During the trial, the plaintiff presented expert testimony from fields including civil engineering, accident reconstruction, product liability, economics, legal nurse consulting, and physical medicine and rehabilitation. These experts addressed causation, liability, and the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and related damages. The defendant countered with experts in neuropsychology, mechanical engineering, accident reconstruction, tire consulting, and physical therapy, likely disputing the cause of the accident or the scope of the plaintiff's alleged damages.
Following the trial, the plaintiff received an award of $9,500,000.
Understanding This Case
- This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
- This case was resolved in Pima County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
- Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want to check your case value?
Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Pima County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver's pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. This happened shortly after the first pickup truck was struck by a third vehicle. The driver of the first pickup truck claimed an injury. The second pickup truck sustained significant damage.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
Explore More Cases Like This
Browse similar cases by injury type and location to get a better understanding of case values in your area.