Awaiting the `INPUT CASE`. Once provided, I will generate the factual narrative according to the specified guidelines.

On October 31, 2016, a compact car carrying a driver and a passenger was struck from behind by a van operated by the defendant in Arlington, while stopped at a yield sign on the Interstate 30 feeder road, waiting to turn onto Cooper Street. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant's negligent operation of his vehicle caused the collision.

The plaintiffs contended the defendant rear-ended their vehicle, citing a police report that listed "following too closely" against the defendant. The driver claimed neck and back injuries, including aggravation of pre-existing conditions. The passenger claimed injuries to her back, legs, shoulders, and knees. Both plaintiffs sought chiropractic treatment. The defendant denied rear-ending the plaintiffs, asserting their vehicle backed into his. The defendant testified his foot slipped off the brake and also claimed the plaintiff driver intentionally backed into his van. The defense argued the plaintiffs' injuries were pre-existing, and the impact was minor, noting vehicle photos showed no visible damage. The defense also questioned the passenger's credibility and suggested medical providers had a financial interest in the outcome. The plaintiff driver did not attend the trial.

A jury in Arlington deliberated for three hours and found the defendant liable for the collision. The jury awarded $7,123 to the plaintiff passenger for past medical expenses and past physical pain and mental anguish. The plaintiff driver received no damages. The record indicated the driver was not present at trial, and no deposition testimony was presented on his behalf, which may have contributed to the zero award.