292 New York car accident cases analyzed. Here's what they resolved for.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The person in the struck vehicle reported injuries to their back and shoulder.

One driver collided with the rear of another vehicle on a highway. The occupants of the struck vehicle claimed severe injuries and incurred economic losses. The parties involved settled their claims.

One driver stopped at a red light when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The injured driver claimed to have sustained disc injuries in their back and a knee injury. The jury awarded damages.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The person in the struck vehicle reported a back injury. The case went to a jury.

A three-car collision occurred when one driver struck the vehicle in front of them. The injured driver, who had a history of prior injuries, claimed to have suffered a herniated disc and a bulging disc in their neck and back. The defense argued the driver had pre-existing conditions and prior claims. The case settled before expert testimony.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The person in the first vehicle experienced neck and back injuries. The case resulted in a jury verdict for the plaintiff.

A passenger's car was rear-ended by another vehicle. The collision happened as the passenger's car was about to make a U-turn. The driver of the striking vehicle and the owner of that vehicle were named as defendants. Liability was admitted, and the case proceeded to a trial on damages. The injured person sustained a herniated disc and experienced pain and limited movement.

One driver rear-ended another vehicle. The case involved a motor vehicle accident. Experts in chiropractic and orthopedic surgery testified.

One driver claimed another driver struck his vehicle twice from behind, then a third time while attempting to pass. The second driver denied fault. The first driver stated he was stopped at a red light when he was hit from behind multiple times. He reported sustaining a bulging disc and a herniated disc. The second driver's attorney argued the first driver did not prove negligence and that his medical review was unremarkable. The jury found the second driver 100% liable.

Two children were injured when their mother's car was hit from behind. The mother's car stopped to let a pedestrian cross the street. The defendant's car then struck the stopped vehicle. The children suffered injuries to their neck and knee.

Three young passengers were riding in a car that was stopped at a red light when it was hit from behind by another car. The passengers were injured in the collision. The driver of the car that hit them was found to be at fault.

One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver rear-ended a car behind them, causing a chain reaction. A passenger in the first car hit their head and sustained neck and back injuries. The injured person received medical treatment, including pain medication, a cervical collar, and chiropractic care. They were out of work for four months and now work in a lighter capacity.