Verdictly
Settlement
Kings County • 2015

Verrazano Bridge Rear-End Collision Settles for $900,000

One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended their vehicle. The injured driver claimed the collision caused back injuries, including a herniated disc, requiring surgery and resulting in permanent pain. The other driver argued that the injuries were pre-existing or related to weight. The jury awarded $1,500,000, but the case settled for $900,000.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$900,000
County
Kings County, NY
Resolved
2015

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision

Settlement Context

This settlement of $900,000 is above the median of $93,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $30,000 to $450,000, based on 103 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In 2010, a driver was involved in a rear-end collision while stopped in traffic on the Verrazano Bridge. The plaintiff, a 47-year-old immigrant, filed a personal injury lawsuit against the defendant, whose liability for the incident was stipulated. The plaintiff alleged the collision caused two lumbar bulges and a lumbar herniation, necessitating a percutaneous discectomy. The plaintiff sought compensation for permanent pain, weakness, and the potential need for future open surgery, with no claims for lost income.

Medical testimony from the plaintiff's treating physicians, specialists in physiatry and pain management, confirmed lumbar bulges and a herniation via MRI. They stated that conservative treatment failed, leading to the discectomy, and despite some improvement, the plaintiff would experience permanent symptoms and faced a risk of deterioration requiring future surgery. The defendant challenged the extent of the plaintiff's claims, suggesting that weight-related factors, not the collision, contributed significantly to future risks. The defendant also contended that the plaintiff's complaints might stem from injuries sustained in a 2003 motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff countered that he was asymptomatic and required no further treatment after approximately one year of conservative care following the earlier accident. Evidence also showed the plaintiff was diabetic.

A jury awarded the plaintiff $1,500,000, including $500,000 for past pain and suffering, $700,000 for future pain and suffering, $50,000 for past medical bills, and $250,000 for future medical bills. The defendant had $1,000,000 in insurance coverage. During the trial, the parties entered a high/low agreement of $200,000/$900,000, which capped the potential award. The case ultimately resolved for $900,000.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Kings County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

47
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Kings County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case