Verdictly
Settlement
Suffolk County • 2023

Suffolk County, New York Rear-End Collision Settles for $5,349

One driver allegedly struck the rear of another vehicle stopped at a red light. This caused the second vehicle to collide with a third vehicle. The first driver's insurer paid a settlement to the second vehicle's insurer and owner.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$5,349
County
Suffolk County, NY
Resolved
2023

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $5,349 is below the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In October 2020, a collision occurred at the intersection of North Ocean Avenue and Old Town Road in Coram, New York, when a defendant driver's 2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee allegedly struck the rear of a 2019 Mazda vehicle. The impact reportedly caused the Mazda to then collide with another vehicle. The plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, as subrogee for the Mazda's insured owner, later alleged the defendant's negligent operation, including failure to maintain adequate following distance and intoxication, caused the incident.

In July 2023, the plaintiff insurer filed a complaint in New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County, asserting it had issued an automobile insurance policy for the Mazda and had paid at least $22,964.08 in damages following the collision. The plaintiff sought to recover this amount, along with interest and costs.

The case concluded in October 2023, when the parties filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice, indicating a settlement had been reached. The defendant's insurer paid $5,349, with $5,181.97 allocated to the plaintiff insurer and $167.03 to the insured individual.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Suffolk County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2023, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

60
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Suffolk County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case