Verdictly
Settlement
Suffolk County • 2018

Suffolk County Multi-Vehicle Collision Settles for $10,000

One driver was involved in a three-vehicle collision. The plaintiff claimed the defendant van driver struck her vehicle, causing it to hit the SUV in front, and then struck her vehicle again. The defendant van driver claimed the SUV stopped short, causing the collision. The plaintiff reported cervical and lumbar nerve root irritation. The jury found the defendant van driver 60% negligent and the decedent 40% negligent. The case settled according to a prior agreement.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Cervical Disc Injury
Multi-vehicle
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Cervical Disc Injury Injuries

Cervical disc injuries involve damage to the intervertebral discs in the neck region (C1-C7). These injuries can include herniated discs, bulging discs, and disc degeneration accelerated by trauma.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$10,000
County
Suffolk County, NY
Resolved
2018

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Cervical Disc Injury
Accident Type
Multi-vehicle
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Multiple Vehicle Collision

Settlement Context

This settlement of $10,000 is below the median of $75,000 for cervical disc injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $20,261 to $300,000, based on 119 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A multi-vehicle collision occurred in Suffolk County, New York, involving a vehicle driven by the plaintiff's decedent, a defendant's van, and a third SUV. The plaintiff's decedent contended her vehicle was struck by the defendant van, propelled into the SUV, and then struck again by the van. The defendant van driver asserted the SUV initiated the collision by stopping short, causing the plaintiff's decedent to strike the SUV before the van then struck the plaintiff's decedent once. The plaintiff alleged the incident caused cervical and lumbar nerve root irritation, resulting in radiculopathy and an inability to return to work. The plaintiff's driver died from unrelated causes approximately two years later.

The plaintiff filed a negligence claim against the defendant van driver. The defendant argued that the plaintiff's decedent had experienced prior symptoms and undergone previous cervical and lumbar MRIs, with a defense radiologist's report indicating no post-accident changes in films. The SUV driver, named as a third-party defendant, was granted summary judgment before trial. A jury subsequently found the defendant van driver 60% negligent and the plaintiff's decedent 40% negligent. The jury also found for the defendant on the no-fault threshold. Prior to trial, the parties had entered into a high/low settlement agreement for $10,000/$100,000, and the case ultimately settled in accordance with that agreement.

Understanding This Case

  • Many cervical disc injuries improve with conservative treatment. However, about 30% of cases may require surgical intervention, with varying degrees of permanent impairment.
  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Suffolk County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

42
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Suffolk County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.