Verdictly
Settlement
Rockland County • 2014

Rockland County, New York Hit-and-Run Insurance Claim Settles for $15,000

One driver struck a pedestrian in an intersection. The pedestrian claimed serious injuries. The case was filed against an indemnification corporation. The parties settled the dispute.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Catastrophic Injury
Pedestrian
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$15,000
County
Rockland County, NY
Resolved
2014

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Catastrophic Injury
Accident Type
Pedestrian
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Economic Injury, Emotional Or Mental Injury, Physical Injury

Settlement Context

This settlement of $15,000 is below the median of $1,000,000 for catastrophic injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $52,460 to $15,025,000, based on 8 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff in Rockland County, New York, sustained severe injuries after being struck by an unidentified hit-and-run vehicle while lawfully crossing an intersection. The motor vehicle's owner and operator remained unknown following the incident.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) in the Supreme Court of New York, 9th Judicial District. The action sought $25,000 in damages for serious injury under the state's Insurance Law. MVAIC did not file an answer to the complaint.

The parties subsequently settled the dispute for $15,000. A stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice was filed, concluding the case.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Rockland County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2014, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

47
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Rockland County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case