Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Kings County • 2009

New York Jury Awards $60,000 in Hit-and-Run Accident

A person was walking across the street when they were struck by a car that left the scene. The injured person sued the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation for injuries to their right knee, which required surgery and resulted in permanent damage. The jury found the defendant liable.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Knee Injury
Pedestrian
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$60,000
County
Kings County, NY
Resolved
2009

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Knee Injury
Accident Type
Pedestrian
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Vehicle negligence, Orthopedic negligence, Surgical negligence

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $60,000 is near the median of $55,000 for knee injury cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $20,000 to $355,000, based on 41 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A 21-year-old pedestrian was struck by an automobile while crossing a street in New York. The plaintiff alleged he was legally in a crosswalk with the "walk" signal activated when the collision occurred. The vehicle subsequently fled the scene, and its driver was never apprehended. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC), responsible for liabilities in accidents involving unidentified drivers in New York.

The plaintiff contended he sustained an internal derangement of his right knee, specifically suprapatellar plica, which required arthroscopic surgery. He further claimed permanent damage to his knee as a result of the incident. Medical records and testimony from an expert orthopedic surgeon were presented to establish the link between the collision and the knee injury. The defendant, MVAIC, disputed this causation, arguing that the suprapatellar plica was not a direct result of the accident.

Following the presentation of evidence, a jury found the defendant liable for the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $60,000 in damages.

Understanding This Case

  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Kings County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2009, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

99
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Kings County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case