Verdictly
Settlement
New York County • 2022

New York County Pedestrian Accident Settles for $9,664.51

A vehicle struck a pedestrian on a street in New York. The pedestrian allegedly sustained serious injuries and incurred economic loss. The case was filed in court, and the parties later settled their claims.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Pedestrian
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$9,664
County
New York County, NY
Resolved
2022

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Pedestrian
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $9,664 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

In Nassau County, New York, a pedestrian was struck by a 1999 Toyota vehicle on Front Street near President Street. The pedestrian reportedly sustained serious injuries and economic loss as a result of the collision. The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) subsequently paid the pedestrian $9,664.51 in first-party benefits.

MVAIC later filed a vehicular liability action in the Supreme Court of New York, New York County, against the vehicle's owner and an unidentified driver. The plaintiff alleged the collision resulted from the defendant's negligence in operating the vehicle and sought to recover the $9,664.51 it had paid in benefits. The vehicle owner, in response, denied the allegations and asserted affirmative defenses, including the pedestrian's culpable conduct and contributory negligence.

The parties subsequently filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice, notifying the court that they had settled their claims.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in New York County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2022, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

82
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in New York County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case