Verdictly
Settlement
New York County • 2015

New York City Sanitation Truck Collision Settles for $25,000

One driver was involved in a motor vehicle accident with a sanitation truck. The driver of the sanitation truck and the City of New York were sued for negligence. A motion for summary judgment was initially denied but later granted on appeal. The case was settled for $25,000.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Truck/Commercial
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$25,000
County
New York County, NY
Resolved
2015

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Truck/Commercial
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Physical Injury, Emotional Or Mental Injury, Economic Injury

Settlement Context

This settlement of $25,000 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident with a sanitation truck operated by a municipal employee in New York City. Another individual also asserted involvement in a collision with the sanitation truck.

In September 2009, the plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit in New York County against the truck operator, the New York City Department of Sanitation, the City of New York, and two other individuals. The municipal defendants subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court initially denied in February 2013.

An appellate court later reversed the trial court's decision, granting summary judgment in favor of the municipal defendants. In February 2015, the plaintiff settled claims with one of the codefendants for $25,000.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in New York County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

96
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in New York County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case