Verdictly
Settlement
Queens County • 2009

New York City Jury Awards $105,000 in Rear-End Collision

One driver was stopped on a bridge when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries, including disc bulges and nerve issues. The other driver argued the injuries were due to a pre-existing condition. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

About Lumbar Disc Injury Injuries

Lumbar disc injuries affect the lower back (L1-L5 and S1), which bears significant body weight and is particularly vulnerable to trauma. These injuries can cause debilitating pain and functional limitations.

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$105,000
County
Queens County, NY
Resolved
2009

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $105,000 is near the median of $93,000 for lumbar disc injury cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $30,000 to $450,000, based on 103 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A rear-end collision occurred on the Queensboro Bridge in New York City when the plaintiff, a 46-year-old male doorman, was stopped and struck by the defendant's vehicle traveling between 10 and 20 mph. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the collision caused multiple injuries, including cervical disc bulges, herniations, nerve compromises, range of motion deficits, and lumbar herniations with radiculopathy, which EMG-NCV testing confirmed. The plaintiff also claimed $5,000 in vehicle damage and a week of lost work.

Liability for the collision was determined against the defendant on a summary judgment motion, and the defendant's threshold motion regarding injury severity was denied prior to trial. The defendant contended that the collision was not severe enough to cause the alleged injuries, arguing they resulted from a pre-existing degenerative condition and noting the limited vehicle damage.

During the trial, the defendant's expert biomechanical engineer testified about the impact dynamics, but the plaintiff challenged this testimony, noting it relied on post-accident photographs and that the expert had not examined the defendant's vehicle. Cross-examination of the defendant's neurologist revealed the expert had not reviewed the plaintiff's medical records and admitted that a rear-end collision could cause disc deformities leading to radiculopathy and pain. The plaintiff sought $160,000 for past and future pain and suffering. A pre-verdict settlement offer of $15,000 was refused. A jury ultimately found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $105,000.

Understanding This Case

  • About 90% of lumbar disc herniations improve with conservative treatment. However, those requiring surgery may face permanent work restrictions and ongoing pain management needs.
  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Queens County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2009, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

93
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Queens County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case