Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Kings County • 2018

Kings County, New York Jury Awards $25,000 in Pedestrian Accident

A pedestrian was walking when an unknown vehicle struck them. The pedestrian sustained serious injuries and incurred medical expenses. The pedestrian filed a lawsuit for negligence against the vehicle operator. A jury awarded the pedestrian $25,000.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Pedestrian
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$25,000
County
Kings County, NY
Resolved
2018

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Pedestrian
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Economic Injury, Emotional Or Mental Injury, Physical Injury

Settlement Context

This verdict-plaintiff of $25,000 is near the median of $22,000 for other cases resolved by verdict-plaintiff. The typical range is $8,200 to $102,285, based on 304 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A pedestrian was struck by an unknown motor vehicle in Kings County, New York. The plaintiff alleged that the collision caused serious injuries, pain, and required extensive medical care, also incurring economic losses. The pedestrian filed a vehicular liability action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) in the Supreme Court of New York, Eighth Judicial District, Kings County, asserting claims of negligence against the unknown vehicle operator.

The case proceeded to a jury trial. The jury subsequently returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $25,000 in damages. Following the verdict, the parties filed a stipulation to discontinue the action with prejudice.

Understanding This Case

  • This case went to trial and resulted in a jury verdict. Verdicts can yield higher awards but carry the risk of receiving nothing if the jury rules against the plaintiff.
  • This case was resolved in Kings County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2018, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

92
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to know what your case might be worth?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Kings County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case