Verdictly
Settlement
Baltimore City County • 2015

Baltimore Jury Awards $75,000 in Excessive Force Case

A man was awarded money after being sprayed with tear gas and tackled by police during civil unrest. He filed a lawsuit alleging excessive force. Video showed him approaching police, and an officer sprayed him with tear gas before he was taken to the ground and removed from the area. The jury heard testimony about the incident and the circumstances surrounding it.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Other Accident
Excessive force

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$75,000
County
Baltimore City County, MD
Resolved
2015

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Other
Case Type
Excessive force

Settlement Context

This settlement of $75,000 is above the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

During the 2015 civil unrest in Baltimore, a man approached police officers after they ordered a crowd to comply with a curfew. A bystander's video showed the man yelling and demanding to be arrested. A lieutenant then sprayed the man with a chemical irritant, which the parties disputed as pepper spray or tear gas, and a sergeant subsequently took him to the ground. He was then removed from the intersection as the crowd began throwing bottles. In April 2016, the man filed an excessive force lawsuit against the officers in Baltimore City Circuit Court.

During the five-day trial, the plaintiff's attorneys presented the bystander video, arguing it showed the plaintiff being sprayed in the face at close range and pulled to the ground by his hair after being incapacitated. Testimony suggested the lieutenant used a form of tear gas for crowd dispersal, which department policy required a public warning for. The plaintiff testified he was participating in civil disobedience by breaking curfew and expected arrest but not excessive force. The defense countered that the officers faced a rapidly evolving, sometimes violent situation and that the plaintiff approached them threateningly and aggressively.

After one day of deliberations, a Baltimore jury awarded the plaintiff $75,000 in January 2018. The verdict indicated the jury likely found the officers' use of force to be excessive under the circumstances described. The Baltimore Law Department indicated it would consult on a potential appeal. The plaintiff was one of several individuals who filed similar lawsuits against police actions during the unrest, with his case being the first to proceed to trial.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Baltimore City County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2015, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

42
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Want to check your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Baltimore City County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case