Verdictly
Settlement
Fulton County • 2021

Georgia Motor Vehicle Negligence Settles for Undisclosed Sum

One driver's vehicle collided with a pedestrian. The pedestrian claimed the driver was negligent and failed to exercise ordinary care. The pedestrian suffered injuries and incurred medical expenses. The parties reached a settlement agreement, and the case was closed.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Other Injury
Pedestrian
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Settlement
Amount
$8,637
County
Fulton County, GA
Resolved
2021

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Other
Accident Type
Pedestrian
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Settlement Context

This settlement of $8,637 is near the median of $15,000 for other cases resolved by settlement. The typical range is $7,752 to $67,500, based on 126 cases in our database.

Case Overview

A pedestrian plaintiff filed a negligence complaint against a defendant following a motor vehicle collision that occurred in Georgia on June 13, 2016. The plaintiff alleged the defendant negligently operated a vehicle, causing the collision while the plaintiff was acting safely. The complaint further claimed the defendant failed to exercise ordinary care, maintain a proper lookout, control the vehicle, and violated Georgia state laws. As a result, the plaintiff reportedly sustained injuries and incurred special damages totaling $8,637.25.

The plaintiff sought past and future medical expenses, lost wages, compensatory damages for pain and suffering, interest, and costs, requesting a jury trial. An insurer later filed defenses, asserting the plaintiff had no cause of action against it, had not obtained judgment against an uninsured person, failed to state a claim for relief, and had not performed certain conditions precedent to bringing the action.

The parties ultimately reached a settlement agreement. On May 20, 2021, the court noted the settlement and closed the case. The specific terms of the settlement, including any damages awarded, were not disclosed in the court records.

Understanding This Case

  • This case was resolved through a settlement, avoiding the uncertainty and expense of a trial. Settlements typically resolve faster and provide guaranteed compensation.
  • This case was resolved in Fulton County, Texas. Local jury tendencies, judge assignments, and regional economic conditions all influence case outcomes in this jurisdiction.
  • Resolved in 2021, this case reflects the legal and economic conditions of that period, including medical costs, insurance practices, and jury award trends at the time.

VerdictlyTM Score

79
/100
Reasonably Fair

This outcome is within expected ranges

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Curious about your case value?

Get a free case evaluation to understand what your motor vehicle accident case might be worth based on cases like this in Fulton County.

Check Your Case Value

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$30,000
Settlement
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On May 26, 2004, a plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile that was rear-ended near the intersection of Bedford Avenue and De Kalb Avenue in Brooklyn. The plaintiff's vehicle was preparing to make a U-turn when the collision occurred. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the driver of the striking vehicle was negligent and the vehicle owner was vicariously liable. The defendants conceded liability, and the case proceeded to trial solely on the issue of damages. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a herniated disc at C5-6, seeking medical treatment 21 days after the incident. Treatment included chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy, and hot and cold packs over several months. The plaintiff reported missing two days of work and alleged permanent neck pain, decreased range of motion, and episodes of immobility, asserting an inability to engage in activities such as dancing, playing basketball, or wearing high heels. A family medicine physician testified on the plaintiff's behalf. The defendants argued that any injuries sustained by the plaintiff resolved within 90 days of the accident, with the decreased range of motion improving within three months. A radiologist testified for the defense, stating that the plaintiff's MRIs were normal and indicated no injury. Prior to the verdict, the parties agreed to cap any damages award at $25,000, which represented the policy limits. The plaintiff had also settled a claim with the driver of the vehicle in which she was a passenger for $3,500. Following the trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $30,000, including $10,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering. The final recovery was then reduced to the agreed-upon $25,000 cap.

Kings County • 2010
View full case